Last Updated |
---|
Mon Nov 15 19:47:39 PST 1999 |
Voters = 80 |
ANCIENTS VOTING:
Voting Results
Favorite Rules | ||
---|---|---|
rules | percentage | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 21% | |
Archon | 20% | |
Armati | 13% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 13% | |
Might of Arms | 9% | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 8% | |
Tactica | 5% | |
Classical Hack | 4% | |
WRG Ancients | 3% | |
Ancient Warfare | 1% | |
Athena | 1% | |
Legion & Empire | 1% | |
Legions & Lions | 1% | |
Wargame Rules 1420-1700 | 1% |
Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
rules played regularly | percentage | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 38% | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 28% | |
Archon | 24% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 23% | |
Armati | 21% | |
WRG Ancients | 13% | |
Might of Arms | 12% | |
Tactica | 10% | |
Classical Hack | 8% | |
Wargame Rules 1420-1700 | 5% | |
Shock of Impact | 4% | |
Legion & Empire | 3% | |
Ancient Empires | 1% | |
Ancient Warfare | 1% | |
Ancient Wargames Rules | 1% | |
Ancients | 1% | |
Athena | 1% | |
Glutter of Ravens | 1% | |
Holy Hack | 1% | |
Legio | 1% | |
Legions & Lions | 1% | |
Phalanx & Legion | 1% | |
Sword & Shield | 1% | |
Universal Soldier | 1% |
Number of Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played regularly | percentage | |
1 rules played | 47% | |
2 rules played | 26% | |
3 rules played | 13% | |
4 rules played | 9% | |
6 rules played | 3% | |
5 rules played | 1% | |
7 rules played | 1% |
Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
rules played at least once | percentage | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 80% | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 71% | |
WRG Ancients | 67% | |
Armati | 53% | |
Tactica | 51% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 33% | |
Archon | 32% | |
Classical Hack | 22% | |
Shock of Impact | 20% | |
Fast Play Rules For Ancient Warfare | 16% | |
Might of Arms | 16% | |
Wargame Rules 1420-1700 | 16% | |
Ancient Empires | 15% | |
Legion | 9% | |
Holy Hack | 8% | |
Glutter of Ravens | 5% | |
Legio | 4% | |
Ancient Warfare | 3% | |
Ancients | 3% | |
Legion & Empire | 3% | |
Rudis | 3% | |
Sword & Shield | 3% | |
The Killing Ground | 3% | |
Alea Iacta Est | 1% | |
Charles Grant's Ancients | 1% | |
Clash | 1% | |
Gladiators | 1% | |
Irregular Ancient Rule Box | 1% | |
Lance | 1% | |
Legions & Lions | 1% | |
Siege | 1% | |
Spear & Shield | 1% | |
Wargame Rules for Entire Battles | 1% |
Number of Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played | percentage | |
6 rules played | 19% | |
5 rules played | 16% | |
3 rules played | 15% | |
4 rules played | 11% | |
2 rules played | 10% | |
10 rules played | 8% | |
9 rules played | 8% | |
7 rules played | 5% | |
12 rules played | 4% | |
1 rules played | 3% | |
8 rules played | 1% |
Voters, By Experience | ||
---|---|---|
level of experience | percentage | |
Up To Twenty Years | 32% | |
Twenty Years or More | 26% | |
Up To Ten Years | 23% | |
Two to Three Years | 14% | |
Novice | 4% |
Voters, By Region | ||
---|---|---|
region | percentage | |
North America | 72% | |
Europe | 18% | |
Western Pacific | 8% | |
Africa | 1% |
Voters, By Setting | ||
---|---|---|
usual game setting | percentage | |
With a friend or two | 53% | |
At the local club | 30% | |
At the local game store | 11% | |
Solitaire | 5% | |
At gaming conventions | 1% |
Number of Armies | ||
---|---|---|
number of armies owned or used | percentage | |
2 army/armies | 12% | |
9 army/armies | 11% | |
3 army/armies | 9% | |
10 army/armies | 7% | |
4 army/armies | 7% | |
5 army/armies | 7% | |
1 army/armies | 5% | |
6 army/armies | 5% | |
7 army/armies | 5% | |
15 army/armies | 4% | |
12 army/armies | 3% | |
13 army/armies | 3% | |
16 army/armies | 3% | |
18 army/armies | 3% | |
25 army/armies | 3% | |
11 army/armies | 1% | |
17 army/armies | 1% | |
19 army/armies | 1% | |
21 army/armies | 1% | |
22 army/armies | 1% | |
27 army/armies | 1% | |
28 army/armies | 1% | |
35 army/armies | 1% | |
43 army/armies | 1% | |
46 army/armies | 1% | |
68 army/armies | 1% | |
8 army/armies | 1% |
Armies Owned/Used | ||
---|---|---|
armies owned or used | percentage | |
Gallic | 45% | |
Marian Roman | 38% | |
Early Imperial Roman | 37% | |
Later Hoplite Greek | 36% | |
Later Carthaginian | 34% | |
Late-Roman West | 30% | |
Late-Roman East | 28% | |
Polybian Roman | 28% | |
Alexandrian Macedonian | 26% | |
Ancient British | 26% | |
Later Achaemenid Persian | 22% | |
Sub-Roman British | 22% | |
Middle Imperial Roman | 21% | |
Camillan Roman | 20% | |
Early Byzantine | 20% | |
Early German | 20% | |
Early Hoplite Greek | 20% | |
Early Saxon | 18% | |
Later Seleucid | 18% | |
Middle Anglo-Saxon | 18% | |
Early Spartan | 17% | |
Parthian | 17% | |
Patrician Roman | 17% | |
Early Achaemenid Persian | 16% | |
Early Sassanid | 16% | |
Early Seleucid | 16% | |
Hunnic | 16% | |
Later Sassanid | 16% | |
New Assyrian | 14% | |
Alexandrian Imperial | 13% | |
Pontic | 13% | |
Thracian | 13% | |
Ancient Spanish | 12% | |
Early Carthaginian | 12% | |
Early Frankish | 12% | |
Early Gothic/Vandal | 12% | |
Early Roman | 12% | |
Hellenistic Greek | 12% | |
Macedonian Early Successor | 12% | |
Pyrrhic | 12% | |
Caledonian/Pictish | 11% | |
New Kingdom Egyptian | 11% | |
Dacian | 9% | |
Hittite | 9% | |
Later Macedonian | 9% | |
Palmyran | 9% | |
Antigonid | 8% | |
Early Indian | 8% | |
Gepid/Lombard | 8% | |
Bactrian and Indo-Greek | 7% | |
Early North Greek | 7% | |
Early Ptolemaic | 7% | |
Eumenid | 7% | |
Galatian | 7% | |
Later Ptolemaic | 7% | |
Later Visigothic | 7% | |
Lysamachid | 7% | |
Skythian | 7% | |
Syracusan | 7% | |
African Vandal | 5% | |
Alan | 5% | |
Italian Ostrogothic | 5% | |
New Babylonian | 5% | |
Numidian | 5% | |
Scots-Irish | 5% | |
Ch'in Chinese | 4% | |
Dark Age and Geometric Greek | 4% | |
Early Armenian | 4% | |
Han Chinese | 4% | |
Mede | 4% | |
Old & Middle Kingdom Egyptian | 4% | |
Slav | 4% | |
Chinese Border Nomad | 3% | |
Early Assyrian | 3% | |
Early Canaanite | 3% | |
Early Hebrew | 3% | |
Early Libyan | 3% | |
Early Northern Barbarian | 3% | |
Etruscan | 3% | |
Illyrian | 3% | |
Jewish Revolt | 3% | |
Kushan | 3% | |
Later Libyan | 3% | |
Later Rhoxolani Sarmatian | 3% | |
Maccabean Jewish | 3% | |
Moorish | 3% | |
Mycenean & Minoan | 3% | |
Bosphoran | 1% | |
Burmese | 1% | |
Campanian/Apulian | 1% | |
Chou Chinese | 1% | |
Cyropaedic Persian | 1% | |
Early Rhoxolani Sarmatian | 1% | |
Early Syrian | 1% | |
Hyksos | 1% | |
Kushite Egyptian | 1% | |
Later Hebrew | 1% | |
Libyan Egyptian | 1% | |
Lydian | 1% | |
Neo-Elamite | 1% | |
Nubian | 1% | |
Pergamene | 1% | |
Philistine | 1% | |
Saitic Egyptian | 1% | |
Samnite/Umbrian | 1% | |
Sea Peoples | 1% | |
Three Kingdoms Chinese | 1% |
Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
period | percentage | |
Rome | 86% | |
Greece | 56% | |
Decline of Rome | 51% | |
Persia | 29% | |
Competitive/Tournament | 21% | |
What-If | 18% | |
Assyria | 16% | |
Egypt | 14% | |
India | 12% | |
Hittite | 10% | |
China | 6% |
Number of Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of genres/periods played | percentage | |
3 periods | 26% | |
2 periods | 25% | |
1 periods | 17% | |
4 periods | 13% | |
6 periods | 6% | |
5 periods | 5% | |
7 periods | 5% | |
8 periods | 3% |
Scales Used | ||
---|---|---|
figure scale | percentage | |
15mm | 80% | |
25mm | 54% | |
6mm | 11% | |
20mm | 6% | |
1/72nd scale | 1% | |
2mm | 1% |
Number of Scales | ||
---|---|---|
number of figure scale(s) used (per person) | percentage | |
1 figure scale(s) used | 54% | |
2 figure scale(s) used | 39% | |
3 figure scale(s) used | 8% |
RECENT BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
Jeff Ruszczyk |
Friendly with my Ostrogothic/Gepid supported Huns versus Knights of St. John...we did a few rules wrong, as it had been several weeks since my last game, but we called it a draw after 3 hours. Next time Attila will guard the baggage with the Gepid Wb(S)... [3 Nov 1999] |
ancientgamer2003 |
My most recent wargame was a solitaire replay of the Battle of the Sabis (Sambre) River in 57 B.C., played with Piquet with its Archon supplement. In this replay, the Nervii successfully ambushed Caesar's legions, who were apparently too tired after their long march to organize an effective resistance. It didn't help that Caesar's allied Gallic cavalry routed right through the 7th legion! Caesar was forced to retreat into camp with the battered remnants of his five remaining legions (the 13th and 14th never showed up), his safety (and more importantly, his honor) in serious jeopardy! A real nail-biter of an Archon battle! [12 Oct 1999] |
James Hamilton |
The last round of the BHGS competition in Leeds. Due to a lot of bad luck and some poor play I was in last place going into the last round. I was using a Hindu Indian army designed to beat the kinght armies that I expected to be there. Up till this point I had not me a knight army, this tine I did and the Feudal Spanish had no chance and what little they had was not helped by a late arriving flank march. The Hindu Indiand won 10-0 with the loss of 2 and a half elements [25 Sep 1999] |
howielex |
DBA: EIR vs. Galacians. EIR won 4-0 with a good terrain position and poor chariot play by the Galacians. [23 Sep 1999] |
Tony Barr |
Camapaign game from the Antiquity Campaign I run at the Humberside Wargames Society. I take the part of independent provinces when invaded by players. Yesterday I was Rhoxolani Sarmatians against the player controlled Sarmatians. I lost.... [19 Sep 1999] |
Michael Walsh |
DBM Ch'in vs Indians at 400pts, Ch'in spear centre rolled over the Indian centre of Bows and Elephants into the Indian camp whilst Chariots and cavalry of both sides skirmished indecisively. [17 Sep 1999] |
Britt Holtsclaw |
Phalanx & Legion. Club rules of the Bundaberg Wargames Society. Byzantines vs Arab Conquest. 15mm. Played on a 5' x 9' table. No terrain in the centre, but hills and some woods on both flanks. The armies are divided into 4 wings each, each moving when its card is pulled (like OTR). The terrain helped the Byzantines, since they had fewer, if heavier, units initially. By mid game, the Arabs had worked themselves around the Byz. left, allowing them to get behind that flank, which quickly collapsed. The Byzantine centre was unable to crush the arab centre before it also was engulfed, and the battle over. [15 Sep 1999] |
Scott Cameron |
I played a game of Legion & Empire against James Manto(rules designer) that involved a force of Sassanid Persians against a Late Roman army. Since I usually play the Sassanid persians, I decided to switch and try the Roman army for a change. The Romans were unlitmately victorious as the Sassanids over exteneded themselves after a successful carge against my line, they were surrounded and hacked down! Glory for Rome! [08 Sep 1999] |
derek ian de villiers |
Played DBM Late Roman Eastern (me) against Horse Barbarians - I got slaughtered! He used heavy cavalry to punch a hole in my battle line splitting my right flank off from the rest of my army. My knights were on my left flank and they could not really catch his light cav - largely useless. My right flank consisted of cav - he killed these first! and aux supported by psiloi (later died fast); my general was the last to die of cav, whereupon the whole command became demoralized. He sent 5 elements into my rear and they killed by baggages, by which time I had lost one third of my command. I felt quite despondent! I could use some advice on how to play with a Roman army! [7 Sep 1999] |
Bob Bryant |
Aug. 20, 1999, Camillan Romans vs Early Seleucids, with 3 friends, using Might of Arms. It was a large game using units 2 stands wide. It was a classic setup with infantry in the center and cavalry on each wing. Each player took half the infantry on his side and the cavalry on one flank. The Seleucids weighted their cavalry on their right flank and swept away the opposing Roman cavalry after a few turns. The Seleucids also had two units of elephants mixed in with infantry to their right center. The Roman had terrible die rolls against them and they swept all before them--unusual for elephants. I was the Roman player on the right flank. The Roman and Seleucid cavalry on this flank neutralized each other. The infantry finally engaged in the center, but the Romans had lost too much on their left flank, so were outnumbered in the center. Most of the Romans routed, so we conceded the game. A twist for this game is that the Seluecids were stronger in Romans at the outset in points. The idea was that a Gallic flanking force would arrive and alter the balance. The Gauls appeared on the table but were too far away to get to the battle in time to help. [04 Sep 1999] |
SELECTED OLDER BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
Michael Marconi |
Played Might of Arms - Roman civil wars. Used many game options. [03 Sep 1999] |
Ben Waterhouse |
Fought my son James (12) to a standstill with my Byzantines against his Vikings using Warhammer Ancient Battles. A small encounter battle with no terrain, 1000 points, using the fantastic Gripping Beast figures. This was a major ploy by me to wean him off ridicuosly expensive 40K gaming (because I pay for it). He loves ancients now and we plan early Imperial Rome versus Ancient Brits armies next; now for his little friends.... [19 May 1999] |
a a sherlock |
Got my Celts stuffed by Early Imp Romans, used a rosta system (archon) and felt that up until the last moment that my Celts were in with a chance, then it all went pear shaped, [2 May 99] |
Tom Keegan |
The last game I played was Sung Chinese against Burmese. I lost right from the set up. I focused to much on my opponents elephants and went for the large units of 48 figures. I did not have a long enough line to protect my flanks appropriatly and was quickly obliterated. [30 Apr 99] |
Mitch Berdinka |
We played an eastern Roman Legion against a western Legion using DBA rules. The more numerous cavalry in the eastern army was a definite advantage enabling an easy win, though not before the other side had wiped out one of the cohorts by some really hoy die rolls. [3 Apr 99] |
Rob Dean |
Two days ago. I took my 6mm travelling DBA set (everything in a small toolbox) to visit a sick wargaming friend in the hospital. I'm sure the docs must have thought we were insane. Anyway, we laid it out on two hospital patient tables side by side and had a couple of rounds of Romans (Middle Imperials, but masquerading as Eastern Later Imperials) against the Sassanids, since I haven't had much of a chance to use the little elephants. I'm afraid that I couldn't manage to lose, though, even for a sick friend. [1 Apr 99] |
jeff wasileski |
My last game used Piquet/Archon and was a scenario in which a rebel Egyptian army with Athenian hoplite allies were attempting to break out of a besieged island in the Nile. Their opposition was a Spartan-led Persian army which started out in a scattered position. The Athenians easily over-ran the Persian infantry opposing them but harrassment by Persian horse archers and command indecision on the part of the Egyptians allowed the Persian heavy cavalry to hit the rebel flanks and a small unit of Spartan hoplites broke the Athenians. [31 Mar 99] |
Bill MacGillivray |
Polybian Roman (with celtiberian allies) against Later Selucid. DBM A perfect ambush broke my opponents mobile command. His scythed chariots got nowhere against the celtiberian caetrati. A fight for the wood in the centre was bloody and inconclusive (but almost cost me a command). When we ran out of time, his C-in-C was attempting to take on an entire command almost single handed. A few more turns would probably have resulted in a 9-1 victory. [31 Mar 99] |
S. Johnson |
We use set-up points and not historical armies, usually. 80 set-up points this time. It's larger than the 12-stand DBA variant but just about as quick. Terrain played a factor since a river of unknowable depth passed through three quadrants. Using an 8-sided die to see how many units could move/turn was appropriate for 80 set-up points, but don't think that it necessarily allows anything like an Ancients "blitzkrieg." In fact, the side that lost had difficulty in the mid-game moving more than two of his five units in any given turn. The "good guys" (i.e. me) won, killing off some heavy chariots (classified as knights) and taking the camp. Light horse on both sides did an impressive job. [31 Mar 99] |
Chris Fielitz |
My ancient British took on a friend's Later Hoplite Greeks using WRG 7th edition rules. It was a nasty fight. I crushed his peltasts, but his hoplite ranks held off my charging warbands. [30 Mar 99] |