Last Updated |
---|
Mon Nov 15 19:47:48 PST 1999 |
Voters = 39 |
ANCIENTS VOTING RESULTS:
Voters, By Period - Decline of Rome
Favorite Rules | ||
---|---|---|
rules | percentage | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 21% | |
Archon | 15% | |
Might of Arms | 13% | |
Armati | 10% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 10% | |
Classical Hack | 8% | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 8% | |
Tactica | 5% | |
Ancient Warfare | 3% | |
Athena | 3% | |
Legion & Empire | 3% | |
Legions & Lions | 3% |
Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
rules played regularly | percentage | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 42% | |
Armati | 24% | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 24% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 24% | |
Archon | 18% | |
Might of Arms | 16% | |
Classical Hack | 11% | |
WRG Ancients | 11% | |
Shock of Impact | 8% | |
Tactica | 8% | |
Legion & Empire | 5% | |
Ancient Warfare | 3% | |
Ancients | 3% | |
Athena | 3% | |
Glutter of Ravens | 3% | |
Holy Hack | 3% | |
Legio | 3% | |
Legions & Lions | 3% | |
Phalanx & Legion | 3% | |
Wargame Rules 1420-1700 | 3% |
Number of Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played regularly | percentage | |
1 rules played | 42% | |
2 rules played | 26% | |
3 rules played | 16% | |
4 rules played | 11% | |
5 rules played | 3% | |
6 rules played | 3% |
Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
rules played at least once | percentage | |
De Bellis Antiquitatis | 87% | |
WRG Ancients | 79% | |
De Bellis Multitudinis | 67% | |
Armati | 51% | |
Tactica | 46% | |
Warhammer Ancient Battles | 33% | |
Archon | 28% | |
Fast Play Rules For Ancient Warfare | 23% | |
Might of Arms | 21% | |
Wargame Rules 1420-1700 | 18% | |
Classical Hack | 15% | |
Shock of Impact | 15% | |
Ancient Empires | 10% | |
Glutter of Ravens | 10% | |
Holy Hack | 10% | |
Legion | 10% | |
Legio | 8% | |
Ancients | 5% | |
Legion & Empire | 5% | |
Ancient Warfare | 3% | |
Charles Grant's Ancients | 3% | |
Irregular Ancient Rule Box | 3% | |
Legions & Lions | 3% | |
Rudis | 3% | |
The Killing Ground | 3% |
Number of Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played | percentage | |
6 rules played | 26% | |
3 rules played | 15% | |
4 rules played | 15% | |
5 rules played | 15% | |
7 rules played | 8% | |
10 rules played | 5% | |
12 rules played | 5% | |
9 rules played | 5% | |
1 rules played | 3% | |
2 rules played | 3% |
Voters, By Experience | ||
---|---|---|
level of experience | percentage | |
Twenty Years or More | 38% | |
Up To Twenty Years | 38% | |
Up To Ten Years | 22% | |
Two to Three Years | 3% |
Voters, By Region | ||
---|---|---|
region | percentage | |
North America | 69% | |
Europe | 19% | |
Western Pacific | 11% |
Voters, By Setting | ||
---|---|---|
usual game setting | percentage | |
With a friend or two | 54% | |
At the local club | 26% | |
At the local game store | 13% | |
Solitaire | 5% | |
At gaming conventions | 3% |
Number of Armies | ||
---|---|---|
number of armies owned or used | percentage | |
10 army/armies | 10% | |
2 army/armies | 10% | |
4 army/armies | 8% | |
7 army/armies | 8% | |
12 army/armies | 5% | |
13 army/armies | 5% | |
15 army/armies | 5% | |
16 army/armies | 5% | |
3 army/armies | 5% | |
17 army/armies | 3% | |
18 army/armies | 3% | |
19 army/armies | 3% | |
22 army/armies | 3% | |
25 army/armies | 3% | |
27 army/armies | 3% | |
28 army/armies | 3% | |
35 army/armies | 3% | |
43 army/armies | 3% | |
46 army/armies | 3% | |
5 army/armies | 3% | |
6 army/armies | 3% | |
68 army/armies | 3% | |
8 army/armies | 3% | |
9 army/armies | 3% |
Armies Owned/Used | ||
---|---|---|
armies owned or used | percentage | |
Late-Roman West | 51% | |
Early Imperial Roman | 49% | |
Late-Roman East | 44% | |
Gallic | 41% | |
Marian Roman | 38% | |
Later Carthaginian | 36% | |
Later Hoplite Greek | 36% | |
Middle Imperial Roman | 33% | |
Sub-Roman British | 33% | |
Middle Anglo-Saxon | 31% | |
Patrician Roman | 31% | |
Alexandrian Macedonian | 28% | |
Early Byzantine | 28% | |
Early Sassanid | 28% | |
Early Saxon | 28% | |
Hunnic | 28% | |
Later Achaemenid Persian | 28% | |
Later Seleucid | 28% | |
Ancient British | 26% | |
Later Sassanid | 26% | |
Camillan Roman | 23% | |
Early Seleucid | 23% | |
Parthian | 23% | |
Caledonian/Pictish | 21% | |
Early Frankish | 21% | |
Macedonian Early Successor | 21% | |
Polybian Roman | 21% | |
Pyrrhic | 21% | |
Thracian | 21% | |
Alexandrian Imperial | 18% | |
Early Achaemenid Persian | 18% | |
Early Carthaginian | 18% | |
Early German | 18% | |
Early Gothic/Vandal | 18% | |
Early Spartan | 18% | |
Pontic | 18% | |
Antigonid | 15% | |
Dacian | 15% | |
Early Hoplite Greek | 15% | |
Early Roman | 15% | |
Hellenistic Greek | 15% | |
Later Macedonian | 15% | |
New Assyrian | 15% | |
Ancient Spanish | 13% | |
Early Ptolemaic | 13% | |
Eumenid | 13% | |
Later Ptolemaic | 13% | |
Later Visigothic | 13% | |
Lysamachid | 13% | |
New Kingdom Egyptian | 13% | |
Palmyran | 13% | |
Alan | 10% | |
Bactrian and Indo-Greek | 10% | |
Galatian | 10% | |
Gepid/Lombard | 10% | |
Scots-Irish | 10% | |
Skythian | 10% | |
Syracusan | 10% | |
African Vandal | 8% | |
Dark Age and Geometric Greek | 8% | |
Early Armenian | 8% | |
Early Indian | 8% | |
Early North Greek | 8% | |
Hittite | 8% | |
Italian Ostrogothic | 8% | |
Mede | 8% | |
New Babylonian | 8% | |
Slav | 8% | |
Early Assyrian | 5% | |
Early Canaanite | 5% | |
Early Hebrew | 5% | |
Early Northern Barbarian | 5% | |
Etruscan | 5% | |
Han Chinese | 5% | |
Illyrian | 5% | |
Jewish Revolt | 5% | |
Kushan | 5% | |
Maccabean Jewish | 5% | |
Moorish | 5% | |
Numidian | 5% | |
Old & Middle Kingdom Egyptian | 5% | |
Bosphoran | 3% | |
Campanian/Apulian | 3% | |
Ch'in Chinese | 3% | |
Chinese Border Nomad | 3% | |
Chou Chinese | 3% | |
Cyropaedic Persian | 3% | |
Early Libyan | 3% | |
Early Rhoxolani Sarmatian | 3% | |
Early Syrian | 3% | |
Hyksos | 3% | |
Kushite Egyptian | 3% | |
Later Hebrew | 3% | |
Later Libyan | 3% | |
Later Rhoxolani Sarmatian | 3% | |
Libyan Egyptian | 3% | |
Lydian | 3% | |
Mycenean & Minoan | 3% | |
Neo-Elamite | 3% | |
Nubian | 3% | |
Pergamene | 3% | |
Philistine | 3% | |
Saitic Egyptian | 3% | |
Samnite/Umbrian | 3% |
Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
period | percentage | |
Decline of Rome | 100% | |
Rome | 87% | |
Greece | 64% | |
Persia | 36% | |
What-If | 23% | |
Competitive/Tournament | 21% | |
Assyria | 18% | |
Egypt | 18% | |
India | 18% | |
Hittite | 13% | |
China | 5% |
Number of Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of genres/periods played | percentage | |
3 periods | 31% | |
4 periods | 21% | |
2 periods | 15% | |
6 periods | 10% | |
5 periods | 8% | |
7 periods | 8% | |
8 periods | 5% | |
1 periods | 3% |
Scales Used | ||
---|---|---|
figure scale | percentage | |
15mm | 79% | |
25mm | 62% | |
6mm | 15% | |
20mm | 8% | |
2mm | 3% |
Number of Scales | ||
---|---|---|
number of figure scale(s) used (per person) | percentage | |
2 figure scale(s) used | 51% | |
1 figure scale(s) used | 41% | |
3 figure scale(s) used | 8% |
RECENT BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
James Hamilton |
The last round of the BHGS competition in Leeds. Due to a lot of bad luck and some poor play I was in last place going into the last round. I was using a Hindu Indian army designed to beat the kinght armies that I expected to be there. Up till this point I had not me a knight army, this tine I did and the Feudal Spanish had no chance and what little they had was not helped by a late arriving flank march. The Hindu Indiand won 10-0 with the loss of 2 and a half elements [25 Sep 1999] |
howielex |
DBA: EIR vs. Galacians. EIR won 4-0 with a good terrain position and poor chariot play by the Galacians. [23 Sep 1999] |
Tony Barr |
Camapaign game from the Antiquity Campaign I run at the Humberside Wargames Society. I take the part of independent provinces when invaded by players. Yesterday I was Rhoxolani Sarmatians against the player controlled Sarmatians. I lost.... [19 Sep 1999] |
Michael Walsh |
DBM Ch'in vs Indians at 400pts, Ch'in spear centre rolled over the Indian centre of Bows and Elephants into the Indian camp whilst Chariots and cavalry of both sides skirmished indecisively. [17 Sep 1999] |
Britt Holtsclaw |
Phalanx & Legion. Club rules of the Bundaberg Wargames Society. Byzantines vs Arab Conquest. 15mm. Played on a 5' x 9' table. No terrain in the centre, but hills and some woods on both flanks. The armies are divided into 4 wings each, each moving when its card is pulled (like OTR). The terrain helped the Byzantines, since they had fewer, if heavier, units initially. By mid game, the Arabs had worked themselves around the Byz. left, allowing them to get behind that flank, which quickly collapsed. The Byzantine centre was unable to crush the arab centre before it also was engulfed, and the battle over. [15 Sep 1999] |
Scott Cameron |
I played a game of Legion & Empire against James Manto(rules designer) that involved a force of Sassanid Persians against a Late Roman army. Since I usually play the Sassanid persians, I decided to switch and try the Roman army for a change. The Romans were unlitmately victorious as the Sassanids over exteneded themselves after a successful carge against my line, they were surrounded and hacked down! Glory for Rome! [08 Sep 1999] |
Chuck Turnitsa |
Last ancients game was a 25mm meeting between Carthago and Rome, and it was glorious. There were stampeding elephants, skirmishers doing "rude" things in the scrub, and legionaires who (led by their commander) stood in the line until the last man died of blood loss!! By the way, the rules used were Might of Arms, which I highly recommend as a very fun rule set. Exploits of this and other battles can be seen at http://www.netcolony.com/members/odms under "After Action Reports". [03 Sep 1999] |
Mike Hillsgrove |
Romans vs Carthaginians, a training/teaching game for a frienbd using Might of Arms rules. Romans won by cracking the Carthaginian main battle line. [02 Sep 1999] |
Francis Reed |
A friend of mine & I played a game of Classical Hack 24 hours ago between a Hellenistic Greek force vs a Later Macedonian force of about 500 points each. The Macedonians won on the front & the left flank. No terrain to speak of but we had fun in about 2 hours. Francis Reed [20 Aug 1999] |
Ben Waterhouse |
Fought my son James (12) to a standstill with my Byzantines against his Vikings using Warhammer Ancient Battles. A small encounter battle with no terrain, 1000 points, using the fantastic Gripping Beast figures. This was a major ploy by me to wean him off ridicuosly expensive 40K gaming (because I pay for it). He loves ancients now and we plan early Imperial Rome versus Ancient Brits armies next; now for his little friends.... [19 May 1999] |
SELECTED OLDER BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
steve dungworth |
Roman Civil war with 3 legions per side (25mm) legions being about 150 figures strong in a fairly rough terrain with key objectives set for each side to obtain by set moves. A very hard fought battle over about 6 hours one Saturday. Result I acheived my objectives but suffered very heavy casualties so really a pyrric victory in that sense. My opponents failed to hit their objectives and also suffered heavy casualties (we only had about 2% difference). Using Athena ancient rules [19 May 1999] |
Chris Lowrey |
My last game was a small one using the Archon rules - a battle between the Romans and Carthaginians. [3 May 99] |
Tom Glennen |
Might of Arms - a great game between carthagians and seleucids. The battle appeared to be a rout at one time. The game then swung back to the other side before eventually returning to the seleucids. As always, lots of fun. [17 Apr 99] |
John P. Winkler |
The last game wasn't Entirely Historical. I pitted my Late Roman Army (15mm) against my friend's, Rick's, Early Imperial Roman Army. We played using Warhammer Ancients Battles. It looked as if I might have an easy victory (with the use of Hun allies; they are great in this set) until one of my legions failed moral. At that point most of my army followed. [4 Apr 99] |
Terry Gore |
Fought against Gary Comardo's superbly painted Gauls, I used Caesarian Romans with supporting ranks to wear the Gauls down before dealing with them. As predicted, the Gauls swarmed all over the Roman vanguard, but were unable to break any of the Roman units. The Gallic cavalry did have some success against the Roman horse, but the hardy Roman infantry in reserve had by then closed upon the Gauls and beat them soundly. In AW, you must tire (disorder) the legionnnaires before simply charging in. A good game and an historical outcome. [4 Apr 99] |
James Manto |
Currently, my Late Imperial Army is fighting a pitched battle against a horde of Alammani in 15mm to play-test my own rules "Legion & Empire." My left wing, containing the bulk of my cavalry is sweeping in on the Alammanic skirmishers. In the center the first line of Auxilia and allied feoderati are advancing on a hill. My right wing which is rather weak (only 4 vexilationes of cav and some Lanciari) are facing all of the barbarian cav and are very worried. They'll probably get squished next weekend (sigh). Last weekend I played a terrific "Classical Hack" game with Phil Viverito at a convention. I ran a few cohorts of Auxilia in a border outpost getting overrun by the Dacians while waiting for the Legions to come to my rescue. Ended up as some pagan sacrifice in a Dacian sacred grove, but it was fun....! [3 Apr 99] |
hal goff |
last campaign using avalon hill's 'hannibal' with armati rules and 4-5 players. generated 6-8 games [2 Apr 99] |
Rob Dean |
Two days ago. I took my 6mm travelling DBA set (everything in a small toolbox) to visit a sick wargaming friend in the hospital. I'm sure the docs must have thought we were insane. Anyway, we laid it out on two hospital patient tables side by side and had a couple of rounds of Romans (Middle Imperials, but masquerading as Eastern Later Imperials) against the Sassanids, since I haven't had much of a chance to use the little elephants. I'm afraid that I couldn't manage to lose, though, even for a sick friend. [1 Apr 99] |
Jeff Bolton |
DBM - 400AP - My Patrician Romans versus Tang Chinese. I over-committed my Fast Knights, trapping my Hunnic allies and messing up my own command and control. This lead to a disappointing 10-0 loss. My PRs are now hold a 1-1 record in this incarnation. I am familiar with a number of rules sets - and am not particularly fond of any. The best - with reservations - is DBA. The worst are Tactica and the pre-DBA WRG offerings. Right now, I am in the process of analyzing GLUTTER OF RAVENS and MIGHT OF ARMS. [31 Mar 99] |
jeff wasileski |
My last game used Piquet/Archon and was a scenario in which a rebel Egyptian army with Athenian hoplite allies were attempting to break out of a besieged island in the Nile. Their opposition was a Spartan-led Persian army which started out in a scattered position. The Athenians easily over-ran the Persian infantry opposing them but harrassment by Persian horse archers and command indecision on the part of the Egyptians allowed the Persian heavy cavalry to hit the rebel flanks and a small unit of Spartan hoplites broke the Athenians. [31 Mar 99] |