Jeremy Sutcliffe | 21 Jul 2009 1:11 a.m. PST |
How about a lifetime moratorium of stifles? FULL STOP |
Henrix | 21 Jul 2009 1:44 a.m. PST |
Or perhaps change the name to something a little less offensive? Stifling people seems like they are being, you know, stifled. If you have a name that implies something the stifler does to himself rather than to others it might help. 'Ignore', or 'do not listen to' might help. And don't show how many people ignore each member. |
Frothers Did It Anyway | 21 Jul 2009 1:59 a.m. PST |
Change the name of Stifle to "x number of people think you are an ." Unleavened truth! |
Connard Sage | 21 Jul 2009 2:13 a.m. PST |
|
turenne | 21 Jul 2009 3:27 a.m. PST |
Why is there no "what's a stifle" option this time? And what IS a stifle? |
Connard Sage | 21 Jul 2009 4:36 a.m. PST |
And what IS a stifle? If we need to keep explaining it after all this time, you really haven't been paying attention TMP link |
Klebert L Hall | 21 Jul 2009 4:36 a.m. PST |
Or perhaps change the name to something a little less offensive? If you think "stifle" is offensive, how did you ever make it through grammar school? -Kle. |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 21 Jul 2009 5:32 a.m. PST |
Why are there all these gray boxes, where did everybody go?
|
John the OFM | 21 Jul 2009 6:05 a.m. PST |
Attention! Attention! Please form two lnes. "Stifles offend me, and are for bedwetting cowards!", please form on the right. "Stifles are harmless, and how dare you tell me how to handle my account!", please form on the left. Thank you. |
Connard Sage | 21 Jul 2009 6:22 a.m. PST |
Which line are you in John? I'll join the other one, out of contrariness. |
John the OFM | 21 Jul 2009 6:25 a.m. PST |
I am on the Left, which is not like me at all. |
GoodBye | 21 Jul 2009 7:19 a.m. PST |
Stifling a stifle; is that like placing a bag of holding into a bag of holding? Dire consequences could occur as the space time continuum is ripped apart and the very fabric of all existence is effectively negated for eternity! Actually it doesn't sound so bad if it gets rid of the stifle debating. Go ahead, I'm down with it. D~ |
Goldwyrm | 21 Jul 2009 7:20 a.m. PST |
I think stifles should be replaced with lawn darts. Where is my choice? |
Palafox | 21 Jul 2009 9:07 a.m. PST |
I don't care about the name nor wheter stifles are discussed or not, but I'm for changing the name of the Dawghouse to The Cooler with Steve McQueen permanentely locked in it until Tom, Dick or Harry are opened and he gets a chance of escaping. |
sneakgun | 21 Jul 2009 10:56 a.m. PST |
Stifle yourself Edith! Archie Bunker is alive and well. How about dueling, we are after all Gentlemen and Ladies? |
The Tin Dictator | 21 Jul 2009 3:56 p.m. PST |
Can we have an AUTO-STIFLE function? I'd like to have anyone who says the word "stifle" automatically stifled. Ack! I think I just auto-stifled myself. 4 times.
.never mind |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 21 Jul 2009 5:20 p.m. PST |
More gray boxes, odd, Hello helloooooo
.. |
zapper | 21 Jul 2009 6:13 p.m. PST |
Can we extend the six months to permanent
PLEASE! |
DocMagus | 22 Jul 2009 5:33 a.m. PST |
I find this funny, I'm new to this and now I might try and see if I can become the stifle god of TMP, anyone know the highest number of stifles
..I need a goal to aspire to :) How bad do I have to be to be stifled? because friends tell me I can be really annoying ! |
streetline | 22 Jul 2009 5:35 a.m. PST |
143. You may find this takes some time. TMP link |
Connard Sage | 22 Jul 2009 6:06 a.m. PST |
I find this funny, I'm new to this and now I might try and see if I can become the stifle god of TMP, anyone know the highest number of stifles
..I need a goal to aspire to :)How bad do I have to be to be stifled? because friends tell me I can be really annoying ! Watch me closely, young padawan, and learn :) |
streetline | 22 Jul 2009 6:11 a.m. PST |
Connard has a high post to stifle ratio. I think that makes it a scale
. :-) |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 22 Jul 2009 5:21 p.m. PST |
quick, the yeses are ahead, we need more no votes just to annoy connard. |
aercdr | 22 Jul 2009 9:57 p.m. PST |
Goldwyrm suggests that stifles be replaced by lawn darts. I suggest that they be replaced by lawn gnomes. |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 23 Jul 2009 2:52 p.m. PST |
Can we stifle the lawn gnomes? |
aecurtis | 24 Jul 2009 5:58 p.m. PST |
"143. You may find this takes some time." It actually didn't take that long. It did, howeve,r require an epic effort. Allen |
Neotacha | 25 Jul 2009 2:22 a.m. PST |
How about no one knows who has been stifled? Or knows how many have stifled them? Or indeed, that stifles exist outside of whomever that particular entity has stifled. If people don't know that fewer than 0.001% of TMP readers have stifled them, perhaps they wouldn't be so fussed. |
Connard Sage | 25 Jul 2009 9:05 a.m. PST |
But without stifle counts Neotacha people wouldn't be able to say things like "198 stifles? Blimey, you must be a right pratt, I think I should stifle you myself" would they? :) |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 26 Jul 2009 6:54 p.m. PST |
Now Connard I would never stifle you just because you're a right pratt. A left pratt, now that's a whole 'nother case!
|
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 26 Jul 2009 6:56 p.m. PST |
Critterette says she'd never stifle you no matter what. Silly girl. |
Connard Sage | 27 Jul 2009 2:56 a.m. PST |
|
Diogenes | 27 Jul 2009 3:19 a.m. PST |
I find it great that the top ten of the most stifled contains three authors I always enjoy and the Editor is number 24! I've never used the button but that's because I like the comedy value of the more outrageous posts – I'm one of those visitors who always has a look in the dawghouse. Because of this I can understand why some people use it, not everyone has my taste in conversation. |
BravoX | 28 Jul 2009 11:17 a.m. PST |
Suprised that the vote was regarded as clear cut enough to justify the ban on mentioning the word that can no longer be mentioned. I mean all it needed was for three people to change their minds and it would have gone the other way. Hmm wonder if I will be dawghoused for mentioning the vote on the unmentionable thing? |
20thmaine | 28 Jul 2009 12:22 p.m. PST |
Cooo
.that was a close one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 28 Jul 2009 4:23 p.m. PST |
So if I say the weather is stifling, stifl gets bleeped? This is going to be a fun 6 months. |
Militia Pete | 28 Jul 2009 8:11 p.m. PST |
Critter 1 that was my question as well. " I was telling the wife when I was in one of my five tanks I own because I am a billionare, you know the really cool King Tiger tank with "Kilroy was here" painted on the side? Yea that one. Well anyway I told the wife that I noticed that the air was a tad stifling
" While we are at it, can we ban the use of "tad"? |
BravoX | 28 Jul 2009 8:16 p.m. PST |
Well we could have a poll and if two vote to ban it and one against then for sure it will be banned! |
FarrowStudios | 29 Jul 2009 1:21 a.m. PST |
Come on guys
.we should all be able to get along, especially on the 'net, right? "" is a no go, guys. Lets all be gamer dorks together, ok? |
FarrowStudios | 29 Jul 2009 1:21 a.m. PST |
|
Gattamalata | 29 Jul 2009 10:43 a.m. PST |
So 44 abstaining members aren't counted for anything? I recall the votes of the indifferent being counted on Cacadore's poll about c-r-a-p
So = bleep? So if I say the weather's stifling or the latest version of Warhammer 40k s creativity, it'll be bleeped like any cuss word?!? Some people
For the record, I voted yes before voting no, as I thought it was supposed to be a six month moratorium on s, not discussion of the subject. Not that I normally care about it, but I don't think anyone should be prohibited from discussing anything, unless it's inappropriate for the fora. |
Rich Knapton | 29 Jul 2009 12:24 p.m. PST |
Does this mean that those who, in the past, have you-know-what-meed in the past will now be confronted with my comments or is it that just the word has been banned? Inquiring minds want to know. Rich |
Tommiatkins | 29 Jul 2009 1:44 p.m. PST |
|
Connard Sage | 30 Jul 2009 8:15 a.m. PST |
TMP link Super. The majority are told what they can or can't talk about by the minority. Did someone mention the First Amendment? No? Oh, never mind, I'm not a US citizen anyway. My supporting membership runs out shortly. I may consider renewing it in 6 months. |
estrus | 30 Jul 2009 9:26 a.m. PST |
Can someone cast up a "word that shall not be named" mini? Maybe a sculpting contest? |