Help support TMP


"The Descent (2005): Based on the J. Long Novel? " Topic


25 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Horror Message Board

Back to the Prehistoric Message Board

Back to the SF Discussion Message Board

Back to the SF Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy
Ancients
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Knaves & Knights


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Veh-Deh-Merd Express

If your tournament is inspired by John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars, you've got to have a train!


4,321 hits since 11 Jun 2006
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Cacique Caribe11 Jun 2006 9:09 p.m. PST

I cannot tell if this film is based at all on the novel by the same name (by Jeff Long):

imdb.com/title/tt0435625
TMP link

Or is it a knock-off by the same title and general theme? Does anyone know?

Thanks.

CC

Cacique Caribe11 Jun 2006 9:16 p.m. PST

I don't see any credit given to J. Long as a writer (the usual "novel based on" legalese):

timeout.com/film/82881.html
link
link

I liked the novel's concept and would get the dvd if it is based on the novel.

CC

Barakvarr11 Jun 2006 9:35 p.m. PST

The only similarity is the basic concept, underground creatures vs humans. The novels appproach of entire armies going down to claim/explore the underground is completely gone. Here it's just reduced to a group of female potholers. No big battles, no underground bases, no characters from the book at all. It's just the name used.

It's not a bad film IMHO, preferred it to the novel in many ways.

Sumatran Rat Monkey12 Jun 2006 12:03 a.m. PST

The novel and the movie aren't connected at all, no.

And I, also, found the movie to be preferable to the novel, far preferable in my case- the movie provided that rarest of beasts, actual creepiness and spooks in a movie. I was surprised.

- Monk

Sumatran Rat Monkey12 Jun 2006 12:05 a.m. PST

Oh- one caveat, though. If you're extremely claustrophobic, there may be a particular scene in the film which you simply cannot watch. I'm not claustrophobic- in fact, I prefer to sleep in dark, right spaces- nor am I prone to being unsettled by… well, much of anything, really- and the scene bothered me.

- Monk

Cacique Caribe13 Jun 2006 2:49 p.m. PST

I will definitely have to check out the film then!!! Thanks.

CC

Covert Walrus15 Jun 2006 12:30 a.m. PST

Saw it. I am claustrophobic, and it reaaaaly bothered me.

When the ludicsous cretures tunred up, it was blessed light relief. That ending Bleeped texted me off royally though.

Cacique Caribe16 Jul 2006 6:28 p.m. PST

Wait a minute . . .

A trailer I just saw on TV and this site claim that it will not make it to theaters until August 4th.

thedescentfilm.com

CC

PaulyJ16 Jul 2006 8:04 p.m. PST

Yes but here in the Uk, we have had the film out for about a year now.

Tis a good film, made me jump more than once, which is always good.

Azantihighlightning17 Jul 2006 4:51 p.m. PST

Strongly recommend it to you guys in the USA, I saw it was due for release shortly after I left.

No connection to the book at all.

Lion in the Stars18 Jul 2006 5:17 p.m. PST

A movie where they actually remembered how to do suspense? Outstanding!!! I'll have to keep my eyes open for this one.

Lowtardog28 Jul 2006 6:43 a.m. PST

Apparently they are showing this on Sky TV UK towards the end of August. Didnt know it was made by the guy who made Dog Soldiers?

Azantihighlightning29 Jul 2006 4:23 p.m. PST

Yeah same writer / director

Cacique Caribe31 Jul 2006 7:45 p.m. PST

Well, it opens this Friday (8/4).

CC

Cacique Caribe05 Aug 2006 3:07 p.m. PST

I guess it is already inspiring some:

TMP link

CC

Cacique Caribe05 Aug 2006 3:12 p.m. PST

For those who have already seen the film, which of these would be the closest to the ghouls in the movie?

TMP link

CC

Doctor Bedlam06 Aug 2006 12:13 a.m. PST

I am not claustrophobic. I am, however, a veteran amateur spelunker, and the concept of going caving without SOMEONE on the outside knowing EXACTLY where I am, where I was going, and when I'm due back… that's idiocy beyond idiocy.

And the scene in question creeped me out, too. I've gotten stuck in a shaft or two, in my time, and there is certainly no creepier feeling than being SURE that the shaft is getting SMALLER on you…

Doctor Bedlam06 Aug 2006 12:16 a.m. PST

Cacique Caribe: these are probably the closest in appearance. The ones in Descent looked like the offspring of Gollum and some demented Nosferatu.

link

helmet10106 Aug 2006 1:51 a.m. PST

Spoiler is here, so you'll know whether it is close to the book or not:

link

Not You07 Aug 2006 2:06 p.m. PST

I thought the movie was lacking in a number of logistical areas. Like Doc Bedlam said, not having anyone up top know where you were is STUPID!

Also the ropes they initally descended into the cavern with were too thin to climb back up. So they were going into an uncharted cave, without telling anyone where they were, into a cave nobody has gone through or even knew if there was an exit to.

The monsters were neat. The women spelinking were stupid as all get out. To the point where I felt most of them deserved anything they got.

Wait to rent it IMO.

caver107 Aug 2006 7:08 p.m. PST

just as a response for "not you" regarding the ropes … bearing in mind that I have only seen the preview, and not the movie itself, but in the preview the rope and ascending gear they show is spot on.

Cave rope is slightly less than .5 inch in diameter, and is static – aka, it doesn't stretch the way climbing rope does, so when you get to the bottom and remove the weight from the line, it won't spring up out of reach.

You climb back up it through the use of mechanical ascenders that grip the rope in one direction, and slide freely in the other. The climbing sensation is not onlike climbing a ladder, or, with some setups, like doing a whole lot of situps.

I will reserve other caving reality vs fictionalized fantasy comments until I actually see the movie, because I am certain there will be a lot of things I don't like about how they portray caving, but the rappel as shown in the preview at least appears feasible.

Now, as to my opinion regarding any predatory species living underground … well, lets just say that if they are large enought to endanger humans, then there had better be some other large food source around for them to turn to when incompetent college spelunkers/cavers fail to show up.

caver

Cacique Caribe26 Dec 2006 2:50 a.m. PST

This fella looks hungry:

picture

CC

Space Monkey26 Dec 2006 12:49 p.m. PST

The movie definitely suggested the creatures had ways of leaving the cave and hunting… the humans just never managed to find any of those exits.

Cacique Caribe11 Mar 2008 8:23 p.m. PST

Claustrophobic film indeed:

link

Natalie Mendoza is hot, as always.

CC

Covert Walrus12 Mar 2008 1:49 a.m. PST

I saw it a year or three ago at the famous 24 Hour Movie Marathon ( World Famous in New Zealand, as they say) and it was released here about a year ago . . . I suspect that we were a test audience as we often are at this event, and the studio decided that they would wait until people had forgotten about that 'Rings' movie and would not be tempted to squeal "My preciousssssss!!!" when the monsters turned up.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.