/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Field applied enhanced protection for armour" Topic

 Help support TMP


"Field applied enhanced protection for armour" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fireteam: WWII


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:285th Scale Sturmoviks from C-in-C

Beowulf Fezian paints up some WWII Soviet aircraft.


Featured Workbench Article

Pete Paints 15mm Early War German LMG Teams

Pete is back - this time, with early-war WWII Germans LMG teams.


Featured Profile Article

Playing the Kokoda Track

On the Kokoda Track at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


181 hits since 6 Nov 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP06 Nov 2025 5:53 a.m. PST

I thought this topic proved fascinating
TMP link
and I was prompted to post a further question about field applied armour additions. Wolfhag suggested starting a new topic, so here goes. We are well used to seeing tank crews trying to enhance their armour protection with everything from concrete to sandbags to logs, but especially with tank tracks applied over the glacis plate. I can see a role when facing kids with panzerfausts or suicidally inclined Imperial Japanese troops, but thinking just about the caterpillar tracks, did they really provide any advantage to compensate for the extra weight, when facing another AFV?

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP06 Nov 2025 7:23 a.m. PST

In part the extra tracks were spare parts that had to go somewhere. So might as well use them as armor.

I doubt any of these had any significant effect against AFVs. AT Rifles, fausts and the like, maybe. I'd guess it was more psychological than practical.

Korvessa06 Nov 2025 9:56 a.m. PST

I always assumed the main reason for extra tracks on tanks was what Crispy said.

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP06 Nov 2025 11:05 a.m. PST

True, but you do see Shermans carrying Churchill tracks, suggesting the crews thought of some use as protection.

But psychological sounds right to me. I assume they could not prove to be shot traps?

TimePortal06 Nov 2025 1:02 p.m. PST

As a platoon leader in 1976, I received a booklet at my new unit which had tips for additional armor etc. The one that perked my ears up was the use of ammo boxes. You would fill them with sand and hang on the sides. Some placed them around the coupla to give an early warning of a sniper. Their first shoot often hit the box

JMcCarroll06 Nov 2025 3:48 p.m. PST

Some field units were attaching 1 or 2 inch plates to the front hull of Shermans. It was frowned upon by higher ups.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.