Cacique Caribe | 17 Sep 2014 3:39 p.m. PST |
link Imagine it floating down already occupied by one or two machine gunners ("drop-pod-like"). Reminds me of astronaut/cosmonaut space capsule landings:
QUESTIONS: Has a bunker drop ever been done, perhaps as part of an advance? If not, why not? Thoughts? Dan |
panzersaurkrautwerfer | 17 Sep 2014 3:46 p.m. PST |
Lack of precision in airdrops prior to the last ten years meant a bunker from the sky had equal chance of landing somewhere with excellent fields of fire, as landing in a swamp. Also the same weight could be a lot more paratroopers or other heavy equipment that might be more useful than a one time bunker. |
Cherno | 17 Sep 2014 3:46 p.m. PST |
Who would volunteer to drop in that thing? Sounds like suicide to me. Also, a bunker weighs a lot, so a big, slow aircraft has to brave AA defenses and enemy fighters to fly over the front line just to deliver one bunker with a macchine gun, which might disrupt supply trucks if dropped close to an important road, but I doubt it's easy to place it exactly where it should, and pointing in the right direction. |
Cacique Caribe | 17 Sep 2014 3:50 p.m. PST |
"Who would volunteer to drop in that thing?" Maybe they were "volunteered" for the mission by their superiors! :) Dan |
raylev3 | 17 Sep 2014 3:53 p.m. PST |
You'd have to control where you actually landed, because once it's on the ground it's not going to move. If it lands in a depression, for example, it would not have the desired field of fire. |
zoneofcontrol | 17 Sep 2014 4:32 p.m. PST |
"If it lands in a depression, for example…" They make meds for that now! Hey, what if they dropped Archie Bunker behind enemy lines? Aw, forget it that was a "meathead" idea. |
TNE2300 | 17 Sep 2014 4:50 p.m. PST |
|
No Such Agency | 17 Sep 2014 5:42 p.m. PST |
airdrop mishaps YouTube link Ouch. Looks… expensive :( But yeah, the "fields of fire" problem is a pretty big one without precision landing. Better to just drop a bunch of hard nosed bastards armed to the teeth, in a stripped down jeep full of ammunition. |
Quaker | 17 Sep 2014 6:29 p.m. PST |
With RPGs, let alone plasma guns, that sounds like an opportunity to be roasted alive. Better off dropping a vehicle. |
Sergeant Paper | 17 Sep 2014 9:55 p.m. PST |
Or drop armored vehicles. |
Mad Mecha Guy | 17 Sep 2014 11:01 p.m. PST |
Not likely to air-drop a bunker as a waste of resources. Once in place would be a sitting duck & only able to cover a small area. To be armoured enough to survival would make very heavy & would need a system to lock bunker into the the ground. More likely to drop a set of remote or automated weapon pods that could camouflage themselves (burying or scurrying to cover) & popping up when needed. |
Spacecow Smith | 17 Sep 2014 11:21 p.m. PST |
The old Kryomek game featured a whole load of turrets which could be deployed by airdrop but that was for use against an alien menace and many were automated but it was an interesting concept. All the best |
Etranger | 17 Sep 2014 11:29 p.m. PST |
The top picture looks like one of Mr Harolds drop pods attached to a parachute! ( I must paint mine….) |
AVAMANGO | 18 Sep 2014 12:09 a.m. PST |
The top picture looks like one of Mr Harolds drop pods attached to a parachute! I was just thinking the same thing. :) |
John Treadaway | 18 Sep 2014 2:26 a.m. PST |
I guess it could be precision dropped in the same way that smart munitions are – maybe not with 'chutes (or not the terminal part of the drop with these anyway) but with retro rockets (think Elon Musk's Dragon 2 capsule). That could ht a very small target area, probably very reliably. It undoubtedly could be done – and accurately – but that doesn't address the slow 're-entry' (as it were) of the thing being targetted by every system on the battlefield: it'd have to have some serious protection to avoid being toasted on the way in: it'd be travelling quite slowly, I'd imagine. And then – as has been said – when it lands, it's really fixed in position. To survive long enough to be worthwhile, it'd have to be armoured like a battleship or have screens or something: very high tech for a device that lands using parachutes. I think a heavy vehicle that is chucked out of a flying transporter (or even from low orbit) on, say, a sled or with a landing system that includes a protective shell (protective against both re-entry and return fire) – maybe one that shatters as it gets lower to provide multiple targets to foil tracking systems, MIRV style – would be the way to go*. Coming in fast – or as fast as the crew can take – slowing down ferrociously at the last minute (so we're talking engines, here, not parachutes) and then deploying to the ground and having motive power to then move if it needs to is a better bet, I think. John T * Anglel HALO tanks in the Crucible rule system: yeah I'm biased! |
tuscaloosa | 18 Sep 2014 3:58 a.m. PST |
The point of airdrops is offensive tactical action, not defensive. |
panzersaurkrautwerfer | 18 Sep 2014 4:23 a.m. PST |
I could see airdropping remote turrets for sure. It'd be about the same effect as a bunker only it's something you can write off if it's overwhelmed, or establishes the green open field is actually a marsh. Also would have much more modest landing equipment (maybe just retrorocket as it doesn't have to worry about pulling very high G forces while slowing down). It's almost be less of an airdrop, and more of bombing run, you'd kick out a few dozen of them along the most likely approaches to the actual LZ and let them buy some time while the actual assault figures out what to do next. |
D for Dubious | 18 Sep 2014 7:51 a.m. PST |
In a sci-fi setting you might find a use if it was a automated system dropped around the your drop zone to provide an initial expendable perimeter around your beachhead. |
Legion 4 | 18 Sep 2014 8:59 a.m. PST |
As tuscaloosa noted, drops are offensive in nature. But I could see dropping bunkers as a hasty defensive action. Regardless, I don't think the troops would land inside … but drop outside near by like with Russian BMD landings … But if the tech was there in the future, along increased accuracy … this might be viable … Note, in a defensive use of Airborne Forces, the 82d in WWII dropped the 504 & 505 PIRs behind friendly lines at Salerno, on 13-14 Sep 43 Italy to rapidly reinforce the US forces already on the ground … |
Lion in the Stars | 18 Sep 2014 12:06 p.m. PST |
Why drop bunkers when you can fire FASCAM artillery rounds instead? Or maybe the M1100 Scorpion Intelligent Munitions System, which is basically a command-detonated AT mine? |
Col Durnford | 18 Sep 2014 1:36 p.m. PST |
I would airdrop a Dalek just to hear is scream "Vision impaired" when the parachute lands on top of it. |
Hayden | 20 Sep 2014 12:31 p.m. PST |
hmm maybe supply drop pods for droptroopers, but can be used as bunker that would be cool |
ravachol | 20 Sep 2014 12:52 p.m. PST |
how if having some digging and crawling capacities to the said bunker … or some limited flight cazpacity to control both landing and redeployement ? |
War Monkey | 20 Sep 2014 4:55 p.m. PST |
In the futre I see they will do away with the parachute and add rockets and guidance systems to it and they will call it! Wait for it! A Drop Pod!!!!
|
Griefbringer | 21 Sep 2014 2:23 a.m. PST |
In modern or near-future setting, I do not quite see it happening. That said, I think I have seen some game rules featuring immobile gun platforms dropped from the orbit. I think the original Space Marine (Epic) rules from GW featured an unmanned drop pod which would deploy as a gun platform with a rotating turret. Not sure how well armoured it was, though. For a more hi-tech future variant, I like the previously suggested option where the para-dropped autonomous robot has limited mobility, allowing it to crawl to a good position where it can dig in and conceal itself, and maybe even deploy a few booby traps in the vicinity to cover blind spots. |
panzersaurkrautwerfer | 21 Sep 2014 3:28 a.m. PST |
I think something like these guys from clearhorizons are likely: link They'd be like a cross between those paratrooper decoys from D-Day and still dangerous enough to do some damage while the actual assault wave hits elsewhere. Or something that could follow the flanks of a raiding force, keeping an outer cordon while the raiders dealt with just the forces on the objective. |
Cacique Caribe | 21 Sep 2014 4:16 a.m. PST |
Maybe a mule robot drone can dig in and serve that function too? link Dan |
panzersaurkrautwerfer | 21 Sep 2014 5:31 a.m. PST |
No. That mule robot is way too cute to do anything but give rides to slightly irradiated children. Is that a scratch build? If not where is it from? |
Cacique Caribe | 21 Sep 2014 12:54 p.m. PST |
|
War Monkey | 21 Sep 2014 7:04 p.m. PST |
One could drop unmanned pods of sorts right into the enemies positions that has a 360 degree rotating machine gun that once hits empty detonates with a huge exspolosion! |
Jemima Fawr | 21 Sep 2014 7:16 p.m. PST |
Or you could just drop bombs… |
Cacique Caribe | 21 Sep 2014 7:25 p.m. PST |
|
War Monkey | 21 Sep 2014 8:09 p.m. PST |
"Or you could just drop bombs" Were is the fun in that! Think of being pinned down by these things knowing that you can't get furthur away and soon the will go BOOM! and their all over the place! |
BlackWidowPilot | 21 Sep 2014 10:39 p.m. PST |
Space Orks would love the idea of a droppable bunker especially if they could fill them up with Gretchins (Grots) and give the smaller, less cognitively endowed cousins lots of noisy automatic weapons and plenty of cheap ammunition. I could see it as an Orky means of securing the perimeter of a larger drop zone, actually, crude as all Hell, but considering the only potential casualties would be amongst the ranks of expendable lesser Orkoid Gretchins and such, the Orks probably wouldn't mind overmuch as long as enough of the silly things managed to land to buy enough time for the rest of the mob to land in the main LZ and deploy more or less unhindered… Leland R. Erickson Metal Express metal-express.net |
chironex | 22 Sep 2014 11:45 p.m. PST |
In Rifts, the Coaliton war against Tolkeen caused the development of portable bunkers with big handles on top such that they could be carried by large flying monsters… |
Cacique Caribe | 23 Sep 2014 2:33 p.m. PST |
That definitely sounds cool! Dan |
PMC317 | 25 Sep 2014 2:53 p.m. PST |
The Norts use air-dropped sentry guns in Rogue Trooper (2000AD). |
Special Action Group Anton | 25 Sep 2014 5:35 p.m. PST |
No foundation. Easy to destroy. Don't tell the Russians that airborne troops are only defensive. They dropped a lot in 42/43 according to Glanz. |
Dave Crowell | 25 Sep 2014 7:01 p.m. PST |
Ion Age has a nice drop bunker gun tower. It's a definite space opera game so I don't mind the extra handwavium employed. Also it has rockets on the base so is droppable from extreme altitude, possibly even orbit and can still make a controled decent to desired location. |
UshCha | 29 Sep 2014 12:07 p.m. PST |
Not really a real world one this. With no camoflarge it would just have shoot me written on it. It would be vulnerable to AAA fire and missiles on the way down. In the air land battle the objective (since and Including WWII with the eception of perhaps Crete) is to land outside the enemy zone and hence land intact and then move in. Difficult with a bunker! Great for space opera which is more like Napolionics with funny guns. |
Artraccoon | 10 Oct 2014 5:43 p.m. PST |
In the Rogue Trooper comics the Norts had an automated gun turret that could be air dropped into position. Several aircraft para-dropped a whole line of the things across Rogue's path. |