Mako11 | 29 Aug 2013 5:28 p.m. PST |
Like when you clicked on a posting here, and there was some actual verbiage to read in the posting, and perhaps a photo, or three (note – the addition of being able to see photos actually posted in the topics is a big plus, and improvement, over the past). What I hate is clicking on a posting, which then immediately points me to a link, without any explanation, photo(s), or other detail as to what the topic is about. For most of those, I usually just hit the back button, without proceeding further, unless I recognize the blog, or have a very strong interest in what I suspect the link might be about. It seems to be getting worse, of late, especially with the rise of personal blogs. I don't have a blog, but do occasionally post links to other things, and/or pics, when for some reason, I can't get them to post here. And yes, I have been guilty of just pointing to a link occasionally, with little explanation, but try to do that as infrequently as possible. So, it would be nice if people could include at least a sentence or two about what the link is to/for, if you want us to take a look. So, does this bug anyone else? |
Heisler | 29 Aug 2013 5:36 p.m. PST |
It bothers me enough that when I make a post here I always try to include at least a couple of pictures, an explanation of what the heck I'm doing and then a link to my blog. I figure I should give someone a chance to decide if they want to head over to my blog or not. |
Coelacanth | 29 Aug 2013 5:38 p.m. PST |
I don't suppose it bothers me much, but I am far less likely to click through without at least a notion of where I'm going and why. Sometimes I have posted links without comment; usually in the case of potentially controversial topics. Ron |
Grelber | 29 Aug 2013 5:39 p.m. PST |
I don't like links with no explanation. Like you, I frequently just don't bother, unless the title of the thread has made it really clear what I'll be getting into. My previous computer was going out for several months, and following links frequently caused problems, so I got into the habit of not clicking. Grelber |
Pictors Studio | 29 Aug 2013 5:40 p.m. PST |
"For most of those, I usually just hit the back button" Ditto. I rarely go forward, if it was worth posting on here about then it was worth posting on here. |
MrHarold | 29 Aug 2013 5:46 p.m. PST |
I think it's reasonable to "grow the forum" as it were. I like to post either the best picture, or a couple of the pictures. I include a link if people would "like to know more"
but I usually include the same text that I would on my blog anyways. I think people should include at least a photo, or if not available, a nice description that holds up on its own. If it is interesting enough, it will bring people to your blog (if that's your goal) |
John the OFM | 29 Aug 2013 5:50 p.m. PST |
Sometimes it amuses me to post a misleading title, and then just a link. I only do this if it's a joke. If it's "important", then I expand on it. It doesn't bother me if it annoys others, because "it's all about ME!" |
Dave Knight | 29 Aug 2013 6:00 p.m. PST |
link My thoughts on this were posted on my blog some time ago. For some reason this is my most popular blog post |
epturner | 29 Aug 2013 6:04 p.m. PST |
What John and Mako said. Eric |
John Leahy | 29 Aug 2013 6:09 p.m. PST |
Yep, I made the same point a few months ago. What is even worse are folks who do the same thing in the Marketplace. Just a link and no explanation. I'm stunned anyone would do that when trying to sell something. Oh well, John |
combatpainter | 29 Aug 2013 6:36 p.m. PST |
Welcome to the modern world. |
Mako11 | 29 Aug 2013 6:46 p.m. PST |
Oh, don't get me wrong, I enjoy many blogs, links to more info, nice photos, various Yahoo Groups, etc. I just hate it when the people posting are so rushed that they don't bother to provide at least a sentence to tell you what it's about. I figure if they can't bother, then neither can I, in most cases. Yes, you are right combatpainter. I guess I should be gleeful that the people posting at least have the education to read, use a computer, and to figure out how to actually post a link, given the current path we are on. I suspect it may only get worse. |
darthfozzywig | 29 Aug 2013 6:54 p.m. PST |
It seems to be getting worse, of late, especially with the rise of personal blogs.</a>Yup. Generally not interested in following links to have to click around for pics elsewhere. If there are some preview pics here, I may check it out. I don't comment on individual blogs, in any event. |
Bunkermeister | 29 Aug 2013 6:55 p.m. PST |
On the rare occasion I point to my blog, I try and explain what it's about before posting the link. I don't post photos because the procedure is still too complicated for me. I have done it a couple times, but usually when I am reading and following the directions as I go, and it's not worth the trouble to do that. I hope that people mention scale in their titles when applicable. Does anyone make 1943 Marines? Is rather pointless until you know the scale the person wants. Mike Bunkermeister Creek bunkermeister.blogspot.com |
Temporary like Achilles | 29 Aug 2013 8:56 p.m. PST |
It usually good to have some idea of what you're letting yourself in for when you click on a link, but as far as I'm concerned members can post whatever they like however they like, so long as it's not malicious. |
Keraunos | 29 Aug 2013 10:54 p.m. PST |
I think I am going to miss being young shortly, but when I was, all my friends and I were unemployed and I had no money – not sure those were good old days, myself. |
kreoseus2 | 30 Aug 2013 3:10 a.m. PST |
I miss scurvy. & Mr sage. And the days before most posts were spam. |
Supercilius Maximus | 30 Aug 2013 4:18 a.m. PST |
Nostalgia just isn't what it used to be. |
Supercilius Maximus | 30 Aug 2013 4:24 a.m. PST |
Sorry, I've just been informed that, thanks to Tylenol[TM], it's actually neuralgia that isn't what it used to be. As you were. |
forrester | 30 Aug 2013 4:48 a.m. PST |
I am aware of one forum where you will get told off by the moderators for doing this. It is helpful to have one or two teaser photos so you can see what it's about. |
Inkpaduta | 30 Aug 2013 5:44 a.m. PST |
I agree, if you post a link at least give us some idea what is about so one can figure out if it is worth their time/interest to go there. |
Augie the Doggie | 30 Aug 2013 6:12 a.m. PST |
Those were the days my friend, we thought they'd never end We'd sing and dance forever and a day We'd live the life we choose We thought we'd never loose For we were young and sure to have our way |
John the OFM | 30 Aug 2013 7:26 a.m. PST |
Go back to Socrates and Aristotle, and you will find them bitching and moaning about "Kids today!" and how things have gone downhill since they were young. |
Caesar | 30 Aug 2013 7:42 a.m. PST |
|
venezia sta affondando | 30 Aug 2013 8:02 a.m. PST |
It's all about perspective. These (now) are my good old days. Youth is a mask but it don't last, live it long and live it fast. |
Silent Pool | 08 Sep 2013 3:58 a.m. PST |
No. I'm me, I'm now, and I know that's all. (Name the song, singer/band, and year for three points) |
Gustav | 08 Sep 2013 8:26 p.m. PST |
ahh The Good Old Days – I remember those
|
richarDISNEY | 11 Dec 2013 9:08 a.m. PST |
Yes.
|
ochoinleicht | 11 Dec 2013 6:53 p.m. PST |
(Name the song, singer/band, and year for three points) 'I'm Mee I'm Now And That's Orl'
from 'B Sides' by Slade (released as a compilation album 2007) AND a Youtube link for 4 points. YouTube link |
Brian Smaller | 12 Dec 2013 1:02 p.m. PST |
I try to post a picture and description of what I link to on my personal blog. |
Altius | 12 Dec 2013 7:57 p.m. PST |
|
FatherOfAllLogic | 14 Dec 2013 7:12 a.m. PST |
Nothing ever stays the same
.. |
Cacique Caribe | 30 Dec 2013 1:25 p.m. PST |
Yeah. I have argued about the "link with no explanation" thing before: TMP link I'm not quite sure if this conclusion makes any sense or not
I think it's even worse now that so many people have blogs. The guys with shorter notes on their blog are not likely to give much information on their TMP post (cryptic titles and not even a pic or explanation), without making their tiny blog sound redundant. This applies also to those with stingy photo habits. If all they took and added to their blog was one or two pics, they aren't going to "give it all away" on a TMP post. So I've come to the assumption that, if they don't want to bother selling me their wares, I'm probably not missing out on much. I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm going back to bed. Dan |