| altfritz | 06 Jan 2013 6:17 p.m. PST |
How come the Polls are all say 2011? Did we get stuck in a time loop somehow? |
| Jakar Nilson | 06 Jan 2013 6:52 p.m. PST |
Weren't the polls halted for most of the year? I think it was catch-up on the timeliness of subjects. |
| Twilight Samurai | 06 Jan 2013 6:55 p.m. PST |
The Editor has suffered a blow to the head?
Unable to cope with life and has retreated to the happy days of 2011?
Either way, probably best not to disturb him. You know, don't poke the Bear, lest he goes postal. |
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 06 Jan 2013 7:26 p.m. PST |
See TMP link (look up December 2012 editorials). |
| Mako11 | 06 Jan 2013 8:36 p.m. PST |
I can't remember back to the Dark Ages of 2011….. |
| SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 06 Jan 2013 9:37 p.m. PST |
I thought it said 2111 myself… |
 Gungnir  | 06 Jan 2013 10:15 p.m. PST |
You don't have the clearance to know the truth. |
| Tin Soldier Man | 06 Jan 2013 11:02 p.m. PST |
Seems sensible to me for rules. How would we know in January 2012 if a set of rules published in December 2011 were the best thing since sliced bread or just a short lived fad. Seems sensible to reserve judgement for a bit (maybe a year is a bit long). Figures, on the other hand, are more immediately obviously good or bad. |
| richarDISNEY | 07 Jan 2013 7:59 a.m. PST |
Personally, I would like more polls.
 |
 20thmaine | 07 Jan 2013 8:00 a.m. PST |
Polls are good. Lack of polls is bad. |
| vtsaogames | 07 Jan 2013 11:31 a.m. PST |
According to the Jewish calendar, 5773.
By the Chinese calendar, 4709.
The Muslims say 1433. Why not have a poll to decide what year it is? |
| Malbrook | 07 Jan 2013 5:28 p.m. PST |
|
