Rogzombie  | 06 Jan 2013 4:17 p.m. PST |
Dark ages sis integrated into ancients. Viking gaming is very popular and I think a separate board would be a good idea. Ancients covers so much ground it gets buried in there. |
Cyrus the Great | 06 Jan 2013 4:22 p.m. PST |
|
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 06 Jan 2013 4:28 p.m. PST |
|
doc mcb | 06 Jan 2013 4:43 p.m. PST |
Yes, I like the idea as well. The aftermath of the fall of the western Roman Empire is an immensely popular period and set of conflicts. The degree of interest certainly merits a separate board. Defining it would be a little tricky or arbitrary. Splintered Light's historicals run from sub-Roman "Arthurian" Britain up to 1066, including Irish and Picts and early Saxons, with later Saxons on the way, and Normans and Vikings. We've discussed plans to add some further late Roman and early Frankish figures, on the early end, and to do Carolingians and some of their enemies also. None of that is quite medieval, except maybe Carolingian and Norman depending on how you define it. But I think the old WRG books were smart in dividing ancient from medieval by a "shieldwall" or Dark Ages period. |
Rassilon | 06 Jan 2013 4:51 p.m. PST |
|
Cyrus the Great | 06 Jan 2013 5:15 p.m. PST |
Maybe with the release of more rules and figures this time it might be a go! |
Mooseworks8 | 06 Jan 2013 6:12 p.m. PST |
|
kreoseus2 | 06 Jan 2013 6:31 p.m. PST |
|
BW1959 | 06 Jan 2013 7:00 p.m. PST |
|
darthfozzywig | 06 Jan 2013 7:02 p.m. PST |
|
Old Glory  | 06 Jan 2013 7:24 p.m. PST |
Perhaps because it has always been lumped in with ancients? Regards Russ Dunaway |
HostileContact | 06 Jan 2013 8:25 p.m. PST |
Count me in as well! HostileContact
|
Rogzombie  | 06 Jan 2013 9:06 p.m. PST |
Thank you folks. It really is a separate period defined by a lot of things. I dont even see any ambiguity in defining it. |
Barks1 | 06 Jan 2013 11:50 p.m. PST |
|
Some Chicken | 07 Jan 2013 2:44 a.m. PST |
Agreed it is deserving of its own board. Another WW2 rule set, Command Decision, was recently granted its own board and it is high time the Dark Ages were separated from ancients. |
Martin Rapier | 07 Jan 2013 3:48 a.m. PST |
It is all just Ancients to me. So no thanks. |
Unrepentant Werewolf at work | 07 Jan 2013 3:56 a.m. PST |
|
kreoseus2 | 07 Jan 2013 4:53 a.m. PST |
|
Maddaz111 | 07 Jan 2013 4:57 a.m. PST |
sorry but against this. when does dark ages start
400 ad? 500ad, after Rome falls? after Byzantium falls. dark ages is a misnomer, and I would be happy with an early medieval board with a proper time delineation. so between 450 and 1050 (as an example) I am doing Greek dark ages army which is 1000 bc? and some empires did not experience a dark age (?) so let's not create an unneeded differentiation. I would be happier if we split up ancients as pre 700 bc and post 100 ad and then had a 450+ early medieval. but lumping together works well enough for me for now. what next a board for world war two realistic rules? for eastern front tanks, for T34 variants? |
Griefbringer | 07 Jan 2013 7:33 a.m. PST |
What is this talk about ancients? Ancient period ends around 500 AD or so, from then on the next thousand years or so form the medieval period. |
richarDISNEY | 07 Jan 2013 9:02 a.m. PST |
I don't play that era, but why not? I like the idea.
 |
vojvoda | 07 Jan 2013 9:21 a.m. PST |
Current thinking is there is no Dark Ages, just early Medieval. VR James Mattes |
martin goddard  | 07 Jan 2013 10:06 a.m. PST |
A Dark Ages board would be most welcome. Martin |
Duc de Limbourg | 07 Jan 2013 1:02 p.m. PST |
If you vote for a french revolution board, I will vote for a dark age one |
Rrobbyrobot | 07 Jan 2013 1:10 p.m. PST |
|
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 07 Jan 2013 4:41 p.m. PST |
I always support new board ideas, as I like anything that adds to the general confusion. In this particular case I would probably actually use it, as I like my vikings. We could even call it the "Vikings And Related" board to avoid confusion
|
its only a flesh wound | 07 Jan 2013 6:19 p.m. PST |
|
Glengarry5 | 07 Jan 2013 6:28 p.m. PST |
There should be a Dark Ages board to clear up the confusion between whether it belongs to the ancient or medieval period! (I've always thought of it as early medieval and while I understand that many historians say it really wasn't that dark Dark Ages sounds more evocative.) |
Griefbringer | 08 Jan 2013 3:50 a.m. PST |
There should be a Dark Ages board to clear up the confusion between whether it belongs to the ancient or medieval period! There is no confusion. If you look at the left menu on this TMP page: TMP link Ancients is defined as being up to 500 AD, and medieval is defined as starting from 500 AD. Clear, simple and easy to remember. |
Rogzombie  | 08 Jan 2013 4:50 p.m. PST |
It seems we either take the academic look and leave it as it is or we take the ppular approach and create a dark ages board which would make it much easier for those of those without opinions of the existence of the dark ages to easier enjoy finding articles about Vikings and whatever else you game during this period popularly known as the dark ages. Consider we are not in a college and that all mini manufacturer have a dark ages section. Whether it exists or not it is a standard gaming delineation and this is a gaming board not a college. |
badwargamer | 08 Jan 2013 7:27 p.m. PST |
Is it possible it would get overSHADOWED? |
HarryHotspurEsq | 01 Apr 2013 9:49 a.m. PST |
There never was a Dark Ages (19th century invention) so there is no need for an independent board
unless it went along with the Victorian science fiction I suppose. |