Help support TMP


"Suggestions for the replacement of the Dawg House." Topic


40 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the TMP Bugs and Features Message Board


Action Log

22 Feb 2011 2:22 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
  • Crossposted to TMP Bugs and Features board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset

MEST


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

World's Greatest Dice Games

A cheap way to pick up on the latest fad and get your own dice cup for wargaming?


Featured Workbench Article

Raising a Giant Succulent

Blocking line-of-sight and channeling movement through elevating a plant.


Featured Profile Article

Instant Mix Epoxy

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian learns to pay attention to all of the details when buying two-part epoxy...


Current Poll


1,376 hits since 30 Jun 2010
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pictors Studio30 Jun 2010 1:46 p.m. PST

If you were to replace it with a system that inserted random words every so often during someone's post that would be interesting ans well as punishing.

Jovian130 Jun 2010 1:56 p.m. PST

I think that the best solution to the Dawghaus issue is for the Editor to appoint/contract with several individuals to act as forum police who monitor the threads, respond to complaints, and follow a written process which must be followed by the moderators. Probably a pipe dream, but it would stop some of the ranting and lots of the complaint button pushing individuals.

Although Pictor's solution has merit too! wink

Personal logo Dances With Words Supporting Member of TMP Fezian30 Jun 2010 1:57 p.m. PST

some of us are already doing that….butnot intentionally…it's called 'a senior moment'…(even if you're not necessarily a 'senior')…or a 'brain-phrt'

DWW

jdpintex30 Jun 2010 2:19 p.m. PST

Send miscreants to live with Kyoteblue.

quidveritas30 Jun 2010 2:29 p.m. PST

No replacement

Calico Bill30 Jun 2010 2:31 p.m. PST

There is no need to replace it. With so many major problems in our lives and the world in general, it seems childish to quibble about something so minor.

DeanMoto30 Jun 2010 2:34 p.m. PST

How should the Dawg House be replaced???

With a Gulag, of course. Work will set you free, baby.

John the OFM30 Jun 2010 3:16 p.m. PST

It should NOT be replaced.

Or, if you do so, replace it with something else that does exactly the same thing, but has a different name.

John the OFM30 Jun 2010 3:21 p.m. PST

Bill should also rig the Poll results to say exactly what HE wants it to say.

HobbyGuy30 Jun 2010 3:28 p.m. PST

The Cat House? NO no.. wait a minute…

Sysiphus30 Jun 2010 4:22 p.m. PST

Call the Dawghouse…Vegas…and Bill can roll a d20 for duration of confinement .

Top Gun Ace30 Jun 2010 4:28 p.m. PST

Cat House?

I like it, though I imagine more people would be trying to get in, than out.

How about the Puppy Mill.

Those incarcerated are required to answer all of those silly repeat questions that come up from newbies to TMP, with a straight face, in an honest manner, e.g. what color were US tanks and equipment in WWII; how do you base your troops; etc.

"Snappy Answers to Silly Questions" are not permitted.

D6 Junkie30 Jun 2010 4:41 p.m. PST

Ok! Really!
I'd like to see some numbers.
How many of the TMPers have actually
been Dawghoused?
I have a feeling that it is a very small
percentage.
Personally of all the possible miniature
and miniature related topics on TMP
that one can enjoy
I find the whole topic of the Dawghouse
one of the least interesting, but
perhaps in attracts those that are the small
percentage often doing time in the Dawghouse.
Okay rant over.
Back to the fun topics.
Mike

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:02 p.m. PST

My suggestion is remove the Dawghouse and replace it with the omnipowerful sinister overlord. Don't post or publicly reference dawghousings in any way, but continue the practice of dawghousing or temporary banning, whatever you want to call it. Just PM the person, tell them their gone for X days for Y post and be done with it. If the member wants to challenge the editor about the dawghousing, fine. It stays between them, changed or not, and that is that. Any member that posts on the boards complaining about being dawghoused is gone for another 10 days.

Bill calls the shots, we all know that going in, and whatever happens, right or wrong, fair or un, we deal with it.

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:16 p.m. PST

Or…

Leave the Dawghouse alone and establish the "Blue Haired Tea Lady Society".

Each time one of us hits the complaint button, we join. Each additional time we hit it after joining, we add to our Blue Haired count, and at the end of the year, the person with the highest count automatically becomes the Blue Haired Tea Lady for the next year. Their user name and logo automatically change, and they must post as the bluest haired of them all for the year.

Kaoschallenged30 Jun 2010 5:28 p.m. PST

kyoteblue. Wasn't what Bill suggested in the "Get Rid of the DawgHous?" thread "If you want to bring it up for a vote, post to the Poll Suggestions board…"? I'm not clear on what he was asking for, suggestions as to what to replace it with or a poll on whether to get rid of it. I think irishserb has it right. Do it but no longer publish it. Robert

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:29 p.m. PST

And/or…
We could have the "Whine List". This would be created by having a whine list button on every post and is really for those of us who whine about the Blue Haired bunch. Each button can be hit by anyone once. Once it is hit, the poster is added to the whine List or his or her count is increased by one. At the end of the year, the top person on the list is the big cheese. For the following year, the person's username and logo changes to "The Big Cheese, and he is not allowed to whine for the following year. If anyone hits the whine list button on the Big Cheese, he is rendered voiceless for the rest of the year.

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:34 p.m. PST

No…wait…

How about TMP Court?

A new board where members could accuse other members of making an inappropriate post. The accuser would have one post to make his case, the accused would have one rebuttal post, then the membership is polled as to who wins, and Bill can do whatever he wants regardless of the poll result.

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:35 p.m. PST

Maybe…three strikes and you're out?

Cosmic Reset30 Jun 2010 5:37 p.m. PST

I vote for just leaving things as they are.

consectari30 Jun 2010 5:38 p.m. PST

I'd prefer not to replace the Dawghouse. It's a pretty mild method of dealing with people who break the rules.

Most forums I go to, if you break the rules, you're hit with the Banhammer. Of course, on those forums, rules are very, very rarely broken…

Wait, can I change my answer?

Ron W DuBray30 Jun 2010 5:44 p.m. PST

no change needed.

John the OFM30 Jun 2010 6:31 p.m. PST

Building on Irishserb's excellent suggestions, ANYONE who hits the [!] button has to spend EXACTLY as much time in the DH as the git he dropped a dime on.
The universe hates ratfinks and informants. Let them have the courage of their convictions and share jail time, AND be exposed as informers by being named.

John the OFM30 Jun 2010 6:36 p.m. PST

OK. How's this for a Poll option?

13) Any TMP member who hits the complaint button [!] to complain about another TMP member's post must share an equal sentence in the DH with the person he complained about, if such complaint would result in a DH sentence.

Let the lawyers polish this up. Not that it would matter, since it's all a judgement call by Bill, anyway!

For what it's worth, I HAVE hit the [!] a few times, and I DO have the courage of my convictions. I would share jail time gladly with the ones I complained about, but I would not perhaps want a locked account. grin

Kaoschallenged30 Jun 2010 7:05 p.m. PST

Sorry but punishing someone for pointing out what may be a infraction of the rules to Bill that he may have missed seems vindictive and counter productive.If abused yes I can see it but otherwise NO. I too HAVE stifled and used the "!" and I can tell you EVERY time it was deserving of it. I had done them not because I disagreed nor approved of the person or post for personal reasons. If that were true I would be very very busy. Leave it as it is or do like irishherb mentioned. Make it non-public so others won't whine about it. Robert

Mapleleaf30 Jun 2010 9:05 p.m. PST

Make it non-public ,

would also stop the endless discussions and "Free--?' posts

NWMike30 Jun 2010 11:05 p.m. PST

I think John the OFM is actually on to something.

If you hit the complaint button too many times in a given period, that is itself an offense. Checks and balances for the win! ;}

Paul Hurst01 Jul 2010 1:58 a.m. PST

TMPer A sees TMPer B breaking the rules, tells Bill, and then gets to be DH'ed for the same time as TMPer B!

And you also want the informant named!

What a load of rubbish! 'Bout time some people grew a pair!

Leave things as they are – if you can't do the time, don't do the crime!

Waterloo01 Jul 2010 4:46 a.m. PST

Leave things the way they are. I'm agree with Paul Hurst, grow a pair.

Klebert L Hall01 Jul 2010 5:11 a.m. PST

Is it worn out?
-Kle.

Feet up now01 Jul 2010 6:24 a.m. PST

Perhaps naughty and wayward posters should have a clown by their name instead of the cool wolf we see.
Also when ever they post the words I AM A DUCK opens the post which will then end with the words THE DUCK HAS SPOKEN at the end .Duck could be replaced with something else like jelly face or mop head ,do a poll for it. :)

Scorpio01 Jul 2010 6:47 a.m. PST

13) Any TMP member who hits the complaint button [!] to complain about another TMP member's post must share an equal sentence in the DH with the person he complained about, if such complaint would result in a DH sentence.

Man, your poll on this lost out. Learn to love the complaint button, or just don't do anything to violate the rules. Easy.

If you hit the complaint button too many times in a given period, that is itself an offense.

Sure, but again, only the boss would see that, and he'd be the one to make that call, if someone is abusing it. And once again, the complaint button isn't the topic here, it's the Dawg House.

elsyrsyn01 Jul 2010 9:54 a.m. PST

The Dawghouse should stay as is, with the excetion (expressed on other threads, and on this one by several people) that I would like to see us stop all the namby-pamby whining and needing a fixed rule for everything, and go back to the days when "Bill's House, Bill's Rules" meant something significant. Oh, and maybe some plumbing work – the plumbing in the Dawghouse definitely needs work. Other than that it's fine as is.

Seriously, though – if somebody hits the ! button, it should be solely for the purpose of alerting Bill to something they find offensive. Then Bill and only Bill should determine whether or not it warrants action and what action that might be, without having to refer to a rulebook. No explanations needed (unless he feels like giving one). Bill's having a bad day? Too bad for you. He's feeling lenient, or you just gave him a super workbench article that keeps you in his good graces – too bad for the ratfink who complained. You manage to talk him around to letting you out of stir? Good for you. You've hit the complaint button too often for trivialites (in Bill's opinion) – into the pen you go.

Fair? The fair only comes once a year. Grow up and get over it.

Revive the dictatorship!
Long live the dictatorship!

Doug

John the OFM01 Jul 2010 11:27 a.m. PST

And you also want the informant named!

OF COURSE I want the informant named!
What is this, TMP or Stalinist Russia? All informants should have to wear a permanent badge of shame, for having turned someone in! Make it a permanent part of their profile page, a new category. "TMP Members sent to the DH: 7"

Space Monkey01 Jul 2010 5:53 p.m. PST

I don't think it needs replacing… I just want the process to be a bit less erratic.
On most forums I'm on a person gets a warning from a mod if a post crosses the line or if a thread starts going off the rails… usually the warning is in the body of the thread.
If the warning is not heeded the thread is axed or the offending parties get a temporary ban (like the current DH).

If that was how it worked here I'd have fewer issues with it… vs. the sudden inability to post because some anonymous/random blue-hair has a vendetta.

CeruLucifus01 Jul 2010 10:25 p.m. PST

I think the Dawghouse is one of the most clever disciplinary tools I've ever seen, on the Internet or anywhere else. And it's funny. Keep it.

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP17 Jul 2010 1:43 a.m. PST

The "Tool Box" ?
TMP link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.