Help support TMP


"Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting" Topic


61 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the TMP Talk Message Board


Action Log

24 Aug 2010 9:50 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from "Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting" to "Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting"
  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Wargaming


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Happy 80th Birthday for Katie's Grandmother

Personal logo Editor Katie The Editor of TMP surprises her grandmother on her 80th birthday.


3,746 hits since 17 Dec 2009
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

wminsing18 Dec 2009 7:51 a.m. PST

When it doubt, don't cross post. That's the rule I always follow.

-Will

Griefbringer18 Dec 2009 10:42 p.m. PST

What popped into my mind was something more like this

That is quite a style – but if somebody made a model like that, pulp gamers would probably find a use for it.

aecurtis Fezian19 Dec 2009 1:26 p.m. PST

TMP link

Comments? It's a good example of highlandcatfrog's thoughts on board relevance sequence. On the front page, it *seems* to link Historicon with British Wargaming as the top priority.

Or it's an ad for "Cross-posting Gone Wild", maybe.

Allen

highlandcatfrog19 Dec 2009 2:02 p.m. PST

An even more recent example:

TMP link

(Sorry Scott, but it shows up on the front page under WW II books.)

And an example of "Look at my blog!" Syndrome:

TMP link

Notice that it's not even posted to the blogs board.

It's gotten way out of hand, so momentarily I'll put my keyboard where my mouth is (so to speak) and make 2 formal poll suggestions.

highlandcatfrog19 Dec 2009 4:10 p.m. PST

Well, at least now I've tried.

vojvoda21 Dec 2009 1:04 p.m. PST

aecurtis 19 Dec 2009 12:26 p.m. PST wrote:

Comments? It's a good example of highlandcatfrog's thoughts on board relevance sequence. On the front page, it *seems* to link Historicon with British Wargaming as the top priority.

Only to those country boards where there are documented HMGS members.
VR
James Mattes

darclegion11 Jan 2010 2:19 p.m. PST

Wow, incredible…

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.