"Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting" Topic
61 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the TMP Talk Message Board
Action Log
24 Aug 2010 9:50 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting" to "Bill And Group: PLEASE Define Purpose Of Cross-Posting"
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article ESLO Terrain explains about their range of modular buildings.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Editor Julia reports once again on our Christmas fundraising project.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Pages: 1 2
| wminsing | 18 Dec 2009 7:51 a.m. PST |
When it doubt, don't cross post. That's the rule I always follow. -Will |
| Griefbringer | 18 Dec 2009 10:42 p.m. PST |
What popped into my mind was something more like this That is quite a style – but if somebody made a model like that, pulp gamers would probably find a use for it. |
aecurtis  | 19 Dec 2009 1:26 p.m. PST |
TMP link Comments? It's a good example of highlandcatfrog's thoughts on board relevance sequence. On the front page, it *seems* to link Historicon with British Wargaming as the top priority. Or it's an ad for "Cross-posting Gone Wild", maybe. Allen |
| highlandcatfrog | 19 Dec 2009 2:02 p.m. PST |
An even more recent example: TMP link (Sorry Scott, but it shows up on the front page under WW II books.) And an example of "Look at my blog!" Syndrome: TMP link Notice that it's not even posted to the blogs board. It's gotten way out of hand, so momentarily I'll put my keyboard where my mouth is (so to speak) and make 2 formal poll suggestions. |
| highlandcatfrog | 19 Dec 2009 4:10 p.m. PST |
Well, at least now I've tried. |
| vojvoda | 21 Dec 2009 1:04 p.m. PST |
aecurtis 19 Dec 2009 12:26 p.m. PST wrote: Comments? It's a good example of highlandcatfrog's thoughts on board relevance sequence. On the front page, it *seems* to link Historicon with British Wargaming as the top priority.
Only to those country boards where there are documented HMGS members.
VR
James Mattes |
| darclegion | 11 Jan 2010 2:19 p.m. PST |
|
Pages: 1 2
|
