Help support TMP


"Napoleonic rules of the Honour: Blucher variety." Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting 6mm Baccus Napoleonic British Infantry

After many years of resisting the urge to start a Napoleonic collection, Monkey Hanger Fezian takes the plunge!


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


3,714 hits since 25 Jun 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
The Picktree Brag25 Jun 2009 6:44 a.m. PST

Greetings all,

Was looking at the preview pages of Sam Mustafa's new Honour rules and am particularly taken with the ideas and scale of the Blucher module. I really like the idea of a single base representing a battalion, especially after seeing Gunner Dunbar's cracking collection:

TMP link

What an excellent level to put things at, grand tactical but retaining individual battalions as the basic movement unit (I never really liked the brigade as the basic unit systems). Since we are all likely to be waiting in great anticipation for blucher's appearance for at least a year and a half can anyone point me towards rulesets of a similar level to have a look at? One battalion to a base?

Cheers,

Josh
Outflanked! outflanked.blogspot.com

50 Dylan CDs and an Icepick25 Jun 2009 7:34 a.m. PST

Hi Josh,

A number of people have asked me about BLÜCHER, so I suppose I might as well post an update here:

At present, it's just a collection of sub-systems: a movement system, a combat system, a command system, etc. It's part of the HONOUR series, so it will use that sequence of play and basing, and the same basic terminology.

Work will begin in earnest after the release of LASALLE, the first of the HONOUR games, coming out in late Autumn (probably Nov/Dec.) I'm presently a bit ahead of schedule, but who knows.

By mid-Summer there will be a new HONOUR website, with a Forum, Scenario-Wiki, and various ways to interact with the project as it develops, so let me thank everybody for all their offers to help playtest, but I need to concentrate on getting LASALLE out the door first.

For those interested in BLÜCHER, I expect to have a unified Beta set of the rules by about 1 Jan, 2010, ready for blind playtesting. This will all be chronicled on the website.

One of the fundamental points about the whole HONOUR system, of course, is the quick interface between the different scales. So if you're doing a campaign, for instance, and your group generates a small action, you can fight it out using LASALLE, or a big action using BLÜCHER, and so on, and your figures will fit perfectly for any scale level, as the games adjust automatically: a battalion of Young Guard infantry in BLÜCHER is a battalion of Young Guard infantry in LASALLE, rated in the exact same way, just depicted at a different "zoom" and thus with rules that emphasize different things.

best,
Sam Mustafa


PS – for the temporary website, with various tidbits and examples:

sammustafa.com/honour.html

M C MonkeyDew25 Jun 2009 8:22 a.m. PST

Paddy Griffith;s Napoleonic Wargames For Fun has an "Army Level" game where one stand = 1 battalion/battery.

Written orders and simultaeneous movement may put some off of these though.

LtJBSz25 Jun 2009 8:30 a.m. PST

In just about every first person account that I have read in the horse and musket period the author speaks of battalions and squadrons, those seem to be the terms that professional military men of the day used when referring to armies. It makes sense that the rules we use should reflect that fact. I have been slowly remounting my Napoleonics to just that style, one stand is a battalion or squadron or battery, for a home grown set of rules that I have been toying with. But as a big fan of Sam Mustafa's rules I was extremely excited to see that "Blucher" seeemed to be exactly what I was looking for. Can't hardly wait for its debut.

Plessiez25 Jun 2009 9:04 a.m. PST

I'm also interested in a set at this scale. I have tried Polemos General de Division, but it was not for me.

blucher25 Jun 2009 10:01 a.m. PST

Yeah im looking foward to this big time. My hope is that it will be a true game of strategy where you can feed troops into battle and reserve/concentrate forces at the right time

onmilitarymatters Sponsoring Member of TMP25 Jun 2009 11:19 a.m. PST

For rules with a slightly larger scale, the recently published Snappy Nappy uses 2 stands = 1 brigade (although games have been done with 2 stands = 1 regt). The scale is designed to make a player a marshal in comand of a corps.

Dennis from OMM
onmilitarymatters.com

The Picktree Brag26 Jun 2009 3:11 a.m. PST

Thanks for the info on BLÜCHER Sam. It sounds like Honour is going to be a really interesting system of rules. Looking forward to seeing the new website and for the BETA rules, I shall have to start a couple of little armies in preparation!

Josh

trailape26 Jun 2009 4:06 a.m. PST

Hi
I also am really excited about the "Honour" Series.
I'm a HUGE fan of FPGA, so I'm very keen to get my hands on "Blucher". That said, LASALLE also looks to be a great set.
I think sam is on a winner with a set of rules that cover the various "Command levels".

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.