"Naughty Girl Being Spanked By Headmaster" Topic

"Headmaster"? With that hat he looks more like an Uhlan to me. I only hope he doesn't get his lance out!

is this the end of wargaming as we know it, I hope joe public doesn't get the wrong ideas.

'why ask why'…..it only makes your head hurt more…..

I hope this does'nt open a 'pandoras box'

Where's the complaint button for showcase items?

Umm, "Not Work Safe" on the front page?

Guiscard

ech.

Good paint jobs, but ugly figures. They look poorly sculpted or maybe cast to me.

On one hand, my observation is that we have a dichotomy between what can be written in a post and what can be displayed on the screen. It reminds me of Victorian sensibilities in some form, like the covering of legs on a table because their form was thought to cause arousal.

However, I do believe slapping this picture on the homepage skirts the line on acceptable, especially given the focus in today's society on criminal and taboo teacher/student relationships.

If you have your adult content filter switched on it doesn't appear on the front page anyway.

So may I suggest that people who are offended by such things avail themselves of that particular TMP function rather than getting their knickers in a twist?

Yes, whatever we do, we shouldn't try and uphold standards.

Excellent point Plynkes. I was commenting for the pun of it.

I think what Plynkes was pointing out is that we have control over the standards. If you don't like that you can turn it off, standards upheld!

As the guy who painted them ---- well, I wouldn't have bought them for myself.

Alex is very kind in saying that the paint jobs are good but the figures are ugly. The second part is certainly true!

I'm not offended, just at work. In the few circumstances where this has happened before, that was a valid concern.

Well okay, I'm a little offended by the quality of the work.

Guiscard

I'm shocked, I tell you! SHOCKED!

Well, not really… 8)=

Actually, MJS I agree you did a great job with the canvas you were given.

Guiscard

She's getting spanked for being ugly?

Somehow reminded of the "Catholic High School Girls in Trouble" trailer in "Kentucky Fried Movie"

"She's getting spanked for being ugly?" – no, I think Professor Uhlan is having to spank her for not polishing his lance properly. And seriously, are people really going to be offended by this picture of two toys? If so, I think they must work/live in a rather strange & puritanical world!

That is so wrong, on so many levels.

Thank heavens I didn't actually POST this… I just foresaw it! Okay, I find it funny, but I work with other adults and don't think this is over the top (errr, "bottom?") for work. If I were concerned I would turn on the adult filter.

That said… um… anybody got a figure of an angry nun holding a ruler?
;-)

By the way: If you want to position the figures so that they are actually in "spanking" configuration, don't base them individually – you'll need to base them together, most likely.

Reminds me of...

As close to lead porn as I've ever seen. Even some of the nudie figures I've seen in the past aren't quite as skanky.

I thought you were'nt allowed to spank young girls anymore.

Only grown-up ones……

Some people like spanking, but I don't think that a toy model is what they want…

Model and painting: 3/10 and 4/10
I've seen much better!

I'm only offended by the quality of the models, not the subject matter. Reminds me of an old girlfriend… the subject matter not the models.

Thanks for the Benny Hill clip! Loved it!

I think its great. We need more of this type thing, some even worse! You dont like it change the station!

I find this article S T U P I D beyond all ing belief. I've recently directed some people to TMP to learn about miniature wargaming and have always had a link to it on my web page (which is ten years old this year). At hbby shows when I put on a display, I always have TMP as a reference.

So what the is the relevance to this to miniature wargaming? As in:

Welcome to The Miniatures Page, the home of miniature 
wargaming on the Internet. A "wargaming miniature" is a scale
replica of a soldier or vehicle intended for use in a game.

I'm really not interested in other people's (the original word was bleeped out when I posted – see the PS below) fantasies. We're a nerdy enough hobby as it is, we don't need s making it worse for us.

THanks a hell of a lot for putting this crap on your web site Bill.

PS you bleep out the M word for and yet you put up crap like this? There's something wrong there, I thing.

I'm really irritated by these school girl sex fantasies that get posted on TMP. Some people lke that sort of thing, well, fine I guess, but please don't sit up and go "d-uh why is everyone offended?" when a number of us take offense to having our wargaming miniatures hobby (see the TMP mission statement quoted above) associated with your s.

Why don't you just make models of a priest ? Please tell me the difference?

Some of us have lived through our small children having been raped in the woods across the street. And still live with the experience 18 years later.

Should I amend my link to TMP with the words "caution, this site is inhabited by a significant number of s and there is a significant amount of non-wargaming models that feature ."?

What say you Bill? I think you should put the same warning right on the top of your site.

I'm afraid that images like this may stir TMPers to post ad nauseum, pontificating the rights and wrong of the subject matter.

As I don't want to disappoint myself I will now pontificate:

Quality of models: 1/10
Quality of painting: 2/10

These sort of images really do reinforce the publics view that wargamers are a bunch of pervs. This is not the sort of thing that TMP should have on the front page.

I'm writing a script for a box of Chill Pills for all yall.

I was hoping for another angle, something with a panty line perhaps.

Everything is wrong about this piece. it sends out totally the wrong message to any parent of a youngster who is getting into wargaming.

What is more, the sculpting is dreadful, the paining worse. Please remove it. People get sent to the dawghouse for language that can only be described as near the mark, yet this pseudo-paedophilia is allowed? I cannot understand the double standards.

We demand balance, where's the headmistress spanking naughty wargamer?

Well, at least we don't have to look at the yellow Hot Wheels car anymore.

I find it tounge in cheek not lude. some of my fathers funniest stories from his youth have endings that involve nuns and big rulers. guess it depends alot on your frame of mind.

These figures make my farts smell good. This should be taken off because the sculpting is truly horrible. It hurt my eys. :) I really don't care if she is bending over or . I don't think anyone has the right to stop me from seeing it though. If you don't like it go somewhere else.

Yawn…

Words fail me. The mind boggles.

Maybe our hobby deserves its reputation after all.

Gotta agree with Tim Marshall on this one.

Chick

tabasco2152 23 Jan 2008 3:54 a.m. PST
I hope this does'nt open a 'pandoras box'

Her name is Pandora?

And the wargaming use of these poorly cast, poorly painted, non-wargaming themed figures is…………….

I think he's spanking the wrong end.

Anyone else would have been dawghoused for a week for posting such filth. Well, relatively speaking. OK, not filth, but something. Maybe such suggestive comments, remarks, and discussion about a fetish such as bondage and discipline. Spanking. So, I guess it's OK to now discuss fetishes on TMP?

I love double standards.

Kinky adolescent fantasy.

Why don't you just make models of a priest ? Please tell me the difference?

Holy crap! Can't believe he said that. Whoa! (Scratches head) I'm dumbfounded.

The girl in the pic is 19 and has been sexualy active since she was 14. I feel really bad for that priest.

Well said, Tim Marshall!

And I thought the CA was rough…….

Interesting the people most upset about this are using cruder descriptions and outright slandering across the board. All in order to vent their disgust. I appreciate those who voiced their opinion in a polite manner and somme just moved on to another subject.

I wasn't going to say anything at all about what is a rather silly, ugly set of miniatures, but then I went and read this sort of nonsense:

>Should I amend my link to TMP with the words "caution, >this site is inhabited by a significant number of >s and there is a significant amount of non->wargaming models that feature ."?

If you do then I also recommend appending it with the disclaimer "There are a also a number of models representing various military factions and governments, and by my reasoning anyone who wants to play with little toy soldiers of a given faction must also support the actions and philosophies taken by that faction."

And before you try to object, yes, your argument is in fact that ridiculous. Actually let me amend that: it's far, far beyond that. Why? Because it shows a rather typical, and lamentable attitude that violence and the trappings of violence are acceptable, but the first time anything even slightly "naughty," and quite frankly the above miniatures are less lewd than an average night of television, is brought forward everyone that doesn't immediately burn out their own eyes and scream for blood is some sort of deviant.

Trying to bring the spector of a child being raped into the picture to add weight to your argument is nothing less than despicable. Child molestation of any sort is a horrible, unforgivable crime, but the only thing you've done is trivialize it in an effort to make a point.

I remeber backin the 70's there was a 54mm vigette of a pirate raping a woman. Those fun loving guys people(gamer and nongamer alike) admire. The sculptor captured the shame,fear and pain on her face. I think they were series 77 figures.In comprision this is only mildly offensive.