I wonder if anyone else has experienced our 'conundrum'
Just played a very hard fought game of Pyrrhus against Camillan Romans. We ended up with a case of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) – both armies broke! Pyrrhus and one of his generals died.
A game that demonstrated why Roman armies post Pyrrhus gave princeps the pilum.
Now the issue we were unable to agree upon:
On page 20 – the line for Heavy Cavalry states:
Heavy Cavalry………..Same as Medium cavalry + armour. The note clarifies the protection value of …….heavy cavalry already takes into account their armour ….abilities.
Armour provides additional protection against shooting – no disagreement there – but on page 16 it also provides an additional safeguard if losing a melee (ie hand to hand).
Does the comment on p20 concerning Heavy Cavalry apply to both shooting and hand to hand?
Grateful any comments.
Garry