Help support TMP


"Shattered Lances battle-report" Topic


Shattered Lances

3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Shattered Lances Rules Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Triumph!


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


744 hits since 19 Feb 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Chthoniid28 Aug 2005 1:52 p.m. PST

I have posted a battle-report of a Crusades game, using SL.
While it is on the SL yahoo website link messages can be viewed by anyone.

SL has two main battle-types- positional and encounter. This game is an example of a positional.

Chthonic regards

B

Parmentier29 Aug 2005 6:15 a.m. PST

Interesting report. The christian charge seems to me the thing to do (that in the fact that sitting there and waiting things out can make for some seriously sleep inducing games), and apparently it was paying off, had it not been for that last 12 you rolled. (what was the result of this: unit routed/general killed?) On the other flank the Christian remained defensive and was starting to get dented (allthough apparently not decisive enough?)

Games won by the scruff or your neck are the best ones!

Peter

Chthoniid29 Aug 2005 1:53 p.m. PST

Interesting report. The christian charge seems to me the thing to do (that in the fact that sitting there and waiting things out can make for some seriously sleep inducing games),

The trick with doing a charge is timing. There was a reason Usamah ibn Munqidh regarded the Franks as the most cautious of peoples in the Outremer.

Another turn or two later, would have given me more problems.

As this was a positional game, the points were skewed in favour of the attacker. So, there was a risk in sending out an unsupported unit too soon.

and apparently it was paying off, had it not been for that last 12 you rolled. (what was the result of this: unit routed/general killed?)

The basic problem was that the chevaliers were disordered from chasing Turkmens, by the time they hit my steady unit of Kurds. I also had 2 units to the Latin 1. So, odds were in favour of the Saracens at this point.

The 12 (from 2d6) was an unexpected bonus (it also causes a general to become a casualty). I didn't need 12 to break the cheavliers, because the melee was tilted in favour of the Kurds at this point (fresh and steady) over the outnumbered chevaliers (tired and disordered).

On the other flank the Christian remained defensive and was starting to get dented (allthough apparently not decisive enough?)

Yes, dented but not going down fast enough <g>.

Games won by the scruff or your neck are the best ones!

Yes, I like games with a bit of drama :-).

Chthonic regards

B

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.