"DBR 25mm cavalry bases" Topic
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the De Bellis Renationis Rules Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Showcase Article
The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Profile Article
For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|doctorphalanx||31 Mar 2008 5:56 a.m. PST|
Do those with old (i.e. 25mm figures) mount them according to the official current DBR standard (e.g. one LC model per base etc) or do you use more figures?
This is the other side of the 28mm debate.
My existing figures were based for George Gush's rules, and while I am more likely to adapt FOG than use DBR, I'm inclined to follow DBR basing.
|a1companion||31 Mar 2008 6:53 a.m. PST|
I must say i love the DBR basing for 28mm.
Close-order cav are 3 to a base and not 4, which makes basing much easier to do. This gives an added advantage that, 2 to a base Order cavalry are much more open than normally based minis. Which means not only are they cheaper to field in units but also you can *see* the minis themselves.
The only issue i have is with the skirmishers, 1 to a 60mm x 40mm base is a little "light", but as light-horse in our period were a diminishing force maybe this is not too much of an issue.
I hope that REN FoG will adopt DBR basing, and not just follow what are for this period would be unnecessarly tight bases.
|Grizwald||31 Mar 2008 9:00 a.m. PST|
"I hope that REN FoG will adopt DBR basing"
There's going to be a REN FoG?
| Bobgnar ||31 Mar 2008 9:26 a.m. PST|
I like the 25mm scale basing for DBR so much, I based all my 15mm in the same way. I put extra terrain on the skirmisher bases. Allows larger armies for the same price as standard would be. I did some Knights (superior) with 3 figures to make them easier to spot.
|Stuart M||31 Mar 2008 10:39 a.m. PST|
I do a bit of both. The Light Cavalry look OK singularly, although Infantry do look a little lost, for these I mount them on 2p pieces
|Phillius ||31 Mar 2008 11:52 a.m. PST|
My pike and shot armies are based for DBM. My pistols and lancers are three to a base. It looks "right"
Two gendarmes to a base, and one Stradiot, does not look "right" at all.
|Phillius ||31 Mar 2008 11:53 a.m. PST|
OOops, and I play DBR. (Reluctantly)
|Stuart M||31 Mar 2008 12:08 p.m. PST|
Stradiots would look right, two to a base. A lot of contemporary woodcuts show them fighting in fairly close order.
One is easier on the pocket but, you're right it doesn't look great, same goes for genitors.
As for Gendarmes, I'm not sure. Two seems OK, you can show off the miniatures and your painting a bit better.
Pistols 3 a base, definitely
..Although perhaps not so for early petronels.
Hey, what does it matter? we know what they are, just go with the gut feeling I reckon
|mashrewba||11 Jan 2009 1:15 p.m. PST|
I did the same as Bob for my ECW- 6 Roundhead horse knee to knee on a 60x 30 and 4 Royalist horse on a 60x40- wonderful.
Both sides have bases with 5 figs on just for, well, a bit of variety.
The infantry are two ranks on a 60 x 40 -nice little dioramas.