Help support TMP


"Lost Battles: Basing Requirements?" Topic


Lost Battles

9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Lost Battles Rules Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Book Review


1,046 hits since 16 Jan 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
JCBJCB10 Dec 2011 4:31 p.m. PST

Is there any reason I have to follow the 1:2:4 convention for basing veteran, average and levy units, respectively? Could I play the game using the single-based units I'm building for Impetus?

Yesthatphil10 Dec 2011 5:00 p.m. PST

Units can be based any way you like as the play is entirely zone to zone. I have played using DBA elements.

It helps to be able to distinguish between the morale values in big battles, and you need to be able to mark/distinguish when the units become shattered.

It is worth noting that Veteran units represent far fewer actual soldiers than Levy units (one of Phil's explicit concepts) so the real units would actually be much different in size – but it doesn't affect any game mechanic …

Goof luck

Phil Steele
soawargamesteam.blogspot.com

JCBJCB10 Dec 2011 5:22 p.m. PST

That's a relief. I have a budding Achaemenid Persian army in 15mm and a Macedonian one to boot, each being built for Impetus. I can't imagine trying to convince my wife that I need three levy colonist cavalry units, each with 24 horsemen. Yikes.

Thanks for the info.

Temporary like Achilles10 Dec 2011 11:49 p.m. PST

One thing you can do with the bigger bases (my gaming buddy uses 80mm x 80mm bases) is have one element represent one average unit or two units of veterans. For levy units you can then put two bases together (assuming you have enough bases…). Not essential, but it helps you keep track of what's what.

It's quite impressive when you do follow the proportions and see, say, Magnesia on the table. It gives a good sense of the relative numbers involved and really brings home the importance of leadership and morale as an equalizer (but I digress!).

Cheers,
Aaron

Martin Rapier11 Dec 2011 2:20 a.m. PST

As above, you can be as flexible as you like, you just need some way of tracking unit quality. I usually try and do levy with at least two bases to remind me of their lower stacking limit. My stuff is all 25mm dbx based.

JCBJCB11 Dec 2011 8:42 p.m. PST

I can swing two bases per levy unit, probably, but four is a stretch – impressive as that must be. Maybe one day I can fill it all out.

Embarrassing to admit, but I find the fighting value/unit proportion/stacking limit discussion in Lost Battles mystifying. Not sure why.

Dexter Ward13 Dec 2011 7:52 a.m. PST

The stacking limits are less mystifying if you the follow the 1:2:4 convention suggested in the rules :-)

Keraunos13 Dec 2011 8:48 a.m. PST

I just finished an EAP army in 15mm, its a fun project to do, although its also the biggest army I have completed in terms of figures, cause there was so much 'levy' level rubbish to paint.

Which figures and what sort of list are you using?

Mine are here:

link

Temporary like Achilles13 Dec 2011 9:06 a.m. PST

Nice job, Keraunos. I have a massive stack of Xyston and Old Glory Late Achaemenids to do up. I'll be bookmarking your page for some inspiration!

A few things to get through first though, unfortunately :)

Cheers,
Aaron

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.