""Conquerors and Kings".. any review ?" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Conquerors and Kings Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleBeowulf paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.
Featured Workbench ArticleDervel returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.
Featured Profile Article
|
Weasel | 07 Jun 2004 8:36 p.m. PST |
I generally like Peter Pig, so have anyone played these rules ? What are they like ? |
martin goddard | 08 Jun 2004 10:27 a.m. PST |
Hello There is a review of these rules on the Society of Ancients site (SOA) i think. They utilise squares in the same manner as WW1 square bashing. This allows clear interpretations of flank support, rear support and morale zones. All units have four bases in them. A base of close order infantry have 4 figures per base/stand. Support roops ae 3 figures to base etc. A typical game uses about 16 units. Base sizs do not matter. Games are all defence/attack types with the victory points adjusted to whether a player is defending por attacking. A game takes about 1.5 hours to play. Martin at Peter Pig |
Weasel | 08 Jun 2004 2:54 p.m. PST |
Cheers! Sounds like its very similar to square bashing, which I have played before. How does it compare to SB ? Does it have army lists included ? |
martin goddard | 08 Jun 2004 3:02 p.m. PST |
Army lists are included. It shares a lot of the square bashing systems. It allows al armies a fair chance of winning All the best martin at peter pig |
|