Help support TMP


"Sikh wars - using "horse, foot, guns" rules" Topic


Horse, Foot and Guns

3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Horse, Foot and Guns Rules Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War
19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of TOWs


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Workbench Article

Tony Builds and Paints a Khang Robot

Tony shows how he puts together and paints a Flash Gordon-inspired sci-fi pulp robot.


801 hits since 9 Jan 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Like the fish22 Jul 2013 4:34 a.m. PST

Hi guys, I was always surprised that there was not an army list for the Sikh wars included by Phil especially as he mentions the Khalsa in the unit types. This is my effort for two forces of 160 points each. I intend to use the excellent ranges by Black Hat and QRF/Friekorps which I believe are compatible. Any input would be welcomed. Many thanks – Nick.

KHALSA
Native potentate 1
Regulars – Stoics 12
Akalis – elite spearmen 2
Irregular foot – Firelocks 8
Inferior – Regular Cuirassiers 1
Inferior – Regular Light cavalry 1
Light horse 4
Sipahis 4
Heavy smoothbore artillery 1
Smoothbore artillery 4
Horse artillery 1
Portable artillery – rockets 1

BRITISH
CP 1
Elite bayonets – British 4
Elite bayonets – Ghurkas 1
Bayonets – sepoys 15
Light infantry 2
Light cavalry 2
Elite light cavalry 2
Heavy smoothbore artillery 1
Smoothbore artillery 2

Personal logo optional field Supporting Member of TMP22 Jul 2013 9:14 a.m. PST

Have you considered classifying the irregular foot as skirmishers instead of firelocks?

Oh Bugger23 Jul 2013 3:20 a.m. PST

Yes certainly some skirmishers for the Sikhs and I would say more heavy smoothbore artillery. The Sikh artillery was heavier and better than its British opponents.

You could give the British rockets.

As to the stoic Sikh foot I'm sure that will work but its worth considering how they would have performed under Generals who wanted to win.

It might be fun to classify them as elite bayonets in a game or two.

I'll take this opportunity to plug 'The First Anglo Sikh War' by Armapal Sidhu up to date and a great read.

I have recently got some Blackhat Sikhs and British to match my QRF ones. The horses are a perfect match and some of the men too. Others are a bit pumpkin headed, not enough to reject them but certainly seperate bases.

I hope Blackhat sort this out as there are some gems there too and it could be a fantastic range.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.