"Improving the Campaign System – the Huns, 459 AD" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the De Bellis Antiquitatis (DBA) Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
| timurilank | 06 Oct 2016 2:17 a.m. PST |
This test is based on historical events surrounding the incursion of the Sassanid Empire in the year 459 AD; King Peroz campaign against the Huns. Historical background, maps, photos and details of the campaign as it played out can be read at the blog. link Cheers,
Robert |
| Durban Gamer | 06 Oct 2016 4:37 a.m. PST |
Very interesting, and the new stepped hills look very nice. Looking forward to reading the campaign rules when finished. They appear to flow nicely and enable the linking of an evening's DBA battles. |
| timurilank | 06 Oct 2016 6:51 a.m. PST |
Those gentle hills can become difficult by laying the rock pieces (as seen on the rocky ground) on top. I plan to construct larger rocky pieces to replace the smaller ones. The revised campaign rules are complete (2 pages) but I may wish to send a few copies to play testers before uploading it to the DBA Wiki. |
| goragrad | 06 Oct 2016 12:14 p.m. PST |
Nice AAR. Interesting campaign. |
| mghFond | 06 Oct 2016 10:15 p.m. PST |
Great stuff, following with interest! |
| timurilank | 07 Oct 2016 3:49 a.m. PST |
Gentlemen, Thank you for the interest. I have two more short campaign tests coming; these will be posted next week. With each test I have to restrain myself from adding features to the basic set. Keeping them separate as page three (advanced options), might be the best way to handle this. |
|
