Help support TMP


"WotR DBMM List" Topic


De Bellis Multitudinis

2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the De Bellis Multitudinis Rules Board

Back to the De Bellis Magistrorum Militum Rules Board


Action Log

03 Jan 2017 7:27 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to De Bellis Multitudinis board

Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Minairons' 1:600 Xebec

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at a fast-assembly naval kit for the Age of Sail.


1,230 hits since 3 Jan 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

maverick290903 Jan 2017 1:59 p.m. PST

Hey folks. Simple question, should the WotR DBMM/DBM list allow Edward IV to take 0-2 sub commanders instead of the 0-1? All of his hard fought battles he had at least 2 highly trusted commanders (especially Barnet and Tewkesbury). What do you all think?

Stanton

aynsley68304 Jan 2017 5:13 a.m. PST

Medieval history isn't my strong point, anything after the dark ages I only really remember the highlights.
I'm assuming the new MM list only allows 0-1, if so it wouldn't be the only new list that's historically inaccurate.
You could always have a friendly with the 0-2 though.
Aynsley

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.