Help support TMP


"Does DBx offer the most flexible basing for multiple rules?" Topic


De Bellis Magistrorum Militum

21 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the De Bellis Magistrorum Militum Rules Board

Back to the De Bellis Multitudinis Rules Board

Back to the Horse, Foot and Guns Rules Board

Back to the Basic Impetus Rules Board

Back to the Hordes of the Things Rules Board

Back to the De Bellis Renationis Rules Board

Back to the Mighty Armies: Fantasy Rules Board

Back to the De Bellis Antiquitatis (DBA) Rules Board


Action Log

02 Jan 2017 9:22 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to Mighty Armies: Fantasy board
  • Crossposted to De Bellis Renationis board
  • Crossposted to Hordes of the Things board
  • Crossposted to Basic Impetus board
  • Crossposted to Horse, Foot and Guns board
  • Crossposted to De Bellis Multitudinis board
  • Crossposted to De Bellis Magistrorum Militum board

Areas of Interest

Fantasy
Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War
19th Century
World War One
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Crossbowmen 1410

The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


428 hits since 3 Jan 2017
©1994-2020 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP03 Nov 2012 8:10 a.m. PST

I'm thinking about making some of the various armies of the Hyborean Age and using the DBx basing convention. I figured the figs could be used for DBA, BBDBA, Basic Impetus, Mighty Armies(?), as well as a few others. I don't care for the Warhammer system, nor am I interested in individual mounting or casualty removal. Am I on the right track with my thinking or not?

advocate03 Nov 2012 8:53 a.m. PST

Yes.

You can add Armati and Hail Caesar to the list.

Toy Soldier Green03 Nov 2012 9:19 a.m. PST

Yes

Who asked this joker03 Nov 2012 9:48 a.m. PST

I think it is flexible not only because everyone is doing it but because close order infantry is 4 per stand, loose order 3 per stand and open order (skirmish) is 2 per stand. It is a natural side effect for DBx representation. Great for figure removal games.

Bob in Edmonton03 Nov 2012 10:04 a.m. PST

Also can used for area-move games (e.g., CCA, Battlelore), Warmaster Ancients and Medievals, and Dux Bellorum (I know I'm out of period here).

MajorB03 Nov 2012 10:18 a.m. PST

Works for Lost Battles too.

Personal logo Gonsalvo Supporting Member of TMP03 Nov 2012 10:25 a.m. PST

It will work for all Piquet/Field of Battle/Hostile Realms family of rules as well.

Whirlwind03 Nov 2012 10:40 a.m. PST

works for Polemos SPQR too

Regards

John the OFM03 Nov 2012 10:41 a.m. PST

Warrior, WRG…

"DBX basing" started out as WRG basing, by the way.

And if you are a real masochist, you can dig up some Newbury Fast Play(sic) Ancients rules, and others of that ilk from the 80s.

stenicplus03 Nov 2012 10:48 a.m. PST

FOG too.

Marshal Mark03 Nov 2012 12:11 p.m. PST

If you don't want indivudual figure removal, then DBX / WRG standard basing is the way to go.

Who asked this joker03 Nov 2012 12:29 p.m. PST

I'll point out that Tactica uses the same frontage but with single figures. For instance, heavy cavalry are based at 13mm per figure which works out to 39mm or about 1 WRG/DBx base. Heavy infantry is 10mm per figure or 4 figures on a 40mm base. Etc. Etc. I short, works with Tactica Medieval/Ancient.

John Leahy Supporting Member of TMP03 Nov 2012 1:37 p.m. PST

Been interested in Hyboria for years too. What scale figs were you planning on using Joe?

Thanks,

John

elsyrsyn03 Nov 2012 5:08 p.m. PST

Yup, it does.

Doug

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP03 Nov 2012 6:53 p.m. PST

John--sent you a PM.

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP03 Nov 2012 9:39 p.m. PST

A number of folks have been building Hyborean armies for Hordes of the THings, right in the DBx family.

KTravlos04 Nov 2012 2:58 a.m. PST

I am not sure. I think individual basing is more flexible as you can use movement trays for any element game you want. It is more time consuming. But you can then play from things like Warhammer and Saga, to DBx.

If we are talking about 15mm then element basing is the norm.

CPBelt04 Nov 2012 10:03 a.m. PST

Don't forget Warmaster and all its flavors. Easy to sub stats for non-GW figs. 20x40 is a great standard.

paulgalenpotter04 Nov 2012 9:07 p.m. PST

Here is a link to discussion of Hyborian armies for Hott on fanaticus, about 22 pages in this thread with numerous photos of figs and armies, may be of some help for your hyborian project.
link
-paul

Yesthatphil05 Nov 2012 3:49 a.m. PST

I think so … (only things like '8Bw' etc. can be tricky)

Dexter Ward07 Nov 2012 4:48 a.m. PST

In my experience, it's easier to play a game which needs single figure removal with element based figures than it is to play an element based game with single figures.
Single figures stuck to element based always come off at the worst moment, whereas marking casualties is easy.
My figures are based for DBx/FoG/Armati/ etc, but I've used them for WAB with no problems at all.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.