"COE Battle of Granicus 334 BC report" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Clash of Empires Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Featured Workbench Article Five finalists are in the painting rounds of the Alpha 54mm Painting Contest (sponsored by Alpha Miniatures). Who will prove themselves masters of painting 54mm scale Ancients?
Featured Profile Article The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.
|
| TMPWargamerabbit | 21 May 2012 1:14 p.m. PST |
Recently the 28mm Clash of Empires Long Beach (California) group staged their monthly game. The subject was the Battle of Granicus 334 BC with Alexander "soon to be Great" vs. Arsites and his local Persian satraps along with some mercenary Greek hoplites. Pictures and the complete written battle report posted at Wargamerabbit.wordpress.com. link
Cheers from the warren. WR |
| Paul Y | 21 May 2012 4:10 p.m. PST |
Comprehensive report with some great-looking armies – thanks for posting!
Cheers
Paul |
| wargame insomniac | 22 May 2012 4:41 a.m. PST |
Looks good. One question- I thought there was only one Pharsalian squadron of Thessalians in the same way that there was an Agema squadron of Companions? Cheers James |
| TMPWargamerabbit | 22 May 2012 8:46 a.m. PST |
WI aka James,
Not being present when the game rosters were initially drawn up I would guess that the total number of Thessalian cavalry compared to Companions is the basis. 1800 or so Thessalian with 1800 Companion cavalry. So the aim was 2 units of each for a total of four cavalry units. I think the game was designed from the Granicus Osprey and J Jonas's scenario list noted on site. Thank you all for the positive comments. Cheers WR |
| wargame insomniac | 22 May 2012 10:13 a.m. PST |
Hi- I agree with split of 1800/1800. It was more that I was expecting One Agema Companion squadron, one Companion squadron, one Pharsalian Thessalian squadron, one Thessalian squadron. Of course if the ruleset does nt distinguish between Agema/Pharaslian and normal squadrons then my query was moot. Cheers James |
| TMPWargamerabbit | 22 May 2012 11:03 a.m. PST |
WI aka James,
Looking over the roster It appears David used the "better" HTH value of 4 vs. a "normal dude "3" for all the Thessalians. Must have been a good day for the Macedonians/Thessalians. They were pumped up for the action. I will "kid him" at the next meeting at the end of May (27th) for his "pumped up Thessalians. We have a Ancient Indian vs. Ancient Indian matchup scheduled. Elephant and chariots… sounds like a real road (chariot) wreck. Still, us lowly Persian types gave them a good run on the tabletop. It was the Greek mercenary hoplites which failed at their glorious moment. WR aka michael |
| wargame insomniac | 22 May 2012 2:40 p.m. PST |
LOL @ WR aka michael re "pumped up Thessalians"! I have nt been to my old gaming club in London for about 5 years. Yet we can still wind each other up about stuff that happened in game 15-20 years ago! Cheers James |
|
