"Should the UK Retain its Gurkha units?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Should the UK Retain its Gurkha units? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article When you only need to carry 72 28mm figures (or less)...
Featured Profile Article How do you depict "shattered forest" on the tabletop?
Current Poll
|
| Florida Tory | 06 Dec 2017 5:46 a.m. PST |
And the UK government is going to listen to the collective wisdom of TMP on this matter? |
 20thmaine  | 06 Dec 2017 6:08 a.m. PST |
Nope – it's just a TMP poll like any other…. |
| Winston Smith | 06 Dec 2017 7:23 a.m. PST |
|
 Flashman14 | 06 Dec 2017 8:12 a.m. PST |
Do they fit into the UK's security and strategic objectives? Do they have unique qualifications that are necessary and otherwise unmet in the current force? Are they cost-effective? |
 miniMo | 06 Dec 2017 11:18 a.m. PST |
Well, they could get shuffled in with previous almagamations to form the Queen's Own Ghurkas In Green Wellies! |
| Flashman14 | 07 Dec 2017 6:53 a.m. PST |
Militaries don't exist for your pleasure, but to forcefully protect your rights against aggressor states. Criteria on a forces structure should be driven by their ability to succeed in warfare. Consideratioms like historical performance, or heritage, or diversity are irrelevent to discussions of their current contribution to military goal attainmemt. |
| Frederick | 07 Dec 2017 7:14 a.m. PST |
From a cost and efficacy point of view I think the Ghurkas a pretty good value for money – plus allow some operational options that are allow a certain amount of flexibility So I would say they are worth keeping – much like the French have retained the Legion Etranger |
|
