"Did You Ever Compromise with the Mystery Tramp?" Topic
21 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Did You Ever Compromise with the Mystery Tramp? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset Rating:
Featured Showcase ArticleIs there finally a gluestick worth buying for paper modelers?
Featured Workbench Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
GamesPoet | 20 Oct 2021 4:57 a.m. PST |
"Once upon a time you dressed so fine Threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn't you? People call say 'beware doll, you're bound to fall' You thought they were all kidding you You used to laugh about Everybody that was hanging out Now you don't talk so loud Now you don't seem so proud About having to be scrounging your next meal How does it feel, how does it feel? To be without a home Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone Ahh you've gone to the finest schools, alright Miss Lonely But you know you only used to get juiced in it Nobody's ever taught you how to live out on the street And now you're gonna have to get used to it You say you never compromise With the mystery tramp, but now you realize He's not selling any alibis As you stare into the vacuum of his eyes And say do you want to make a deal? How does it feel, how does it feel? To be on your own, with no direction home A complete unknown, like a rolling stone Ah you never turned around to see the frowns On the jugglers and the clowns when they all did tricks for you You never understood that it ain't no good You shouldn't let other people get your kicks for you You used to ride on a chrome horse with your diplomat Who carried on his shoulder a Siamese cat Ain't it hard when you discovered that He really wasn't where it's at After he took from you everything he could steal How does it feel, how does it feel? To have on your own, with no direction home Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone Ahh princess on a steeple and all the pretty people They're all drinking, thinking that they've got it made Exchanging all precious gifts But you better take your diamond ring, you better pawn it babe You used to be so amused At Napoleon in rags and the language that he used Go to him he calls you, you can't refuse When you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose You're invisible now, you've got no secrets to conceal How does it feel, ah how does it feel? To be on your own, with no direction home Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone" by Bob Dylan, 1965 |
Deucey | 20 Oct 2021 6:59 a.m. PST |
|
GamesPoet | 20 Oct 2021 7:34 a.m. PST |
If you read it, it will come. ; ) The title of the poll is half way down in the third paragraph. |
John the OFM | 20 Oct 2021 8:00 a.m. PST |
Needs some bad harmonica. |
The Virtual Armchair General | 20 Oct 2021 9:11 a.m. PST |
Or maybe a 250 rank pipe organ? So you can't hear the lyrics? TVAG |
Parzival | 20 Oct 2021 9:31 a.m. PST |
You can hear the lyrics??? Never could pick much out of that song but the chorus, myself. It's fun to mock-sing like Dylan, because anyone can. |
ZULUPAUL | 20 Oct 2021 11:10 a.m. PST |
|
Old Contemptible | 20 Oct 2021 2:30 p.m. PST |
|
GamesPoet | 20 Oct 2021 5:59 p.m. PST |
Dylan himself said in reference to this song, "I don't want to scream it", and he had a reason. And the person being addressed by Dylan in the song is a woman, and from the description and upper class one at that, and then seemingly a fall from her place, and cast away, while failing to see the situation that was developing to her. And the song repeats the same pattern, while at the same time seems to hint at a possibility of improvement, as if a choice can be made still, its not too late. When one looks deeper at it, the patterns, the rhyming, the actual music itself, and the whole thing done in one take, the first time they sat down to record it, it starts to take on more meaning across the spectrum of the music poetry that exists. And his voice, oh he gets lots of criticism for that, yet here it is subtly changing, if one is open to actually listening for such, and willing to accept his authoritarian perspective that seems to be sensitive to the person's situation as well. And this leads to the pondering on what is the relationship between the singer and the woman. And then there is this "rolling stone", two words that appeared in other songs prior to Dylan's. And the song came at a time when folks actually listening to his music were in essence feeling the same way that the woman is feeling. And while coming during an era where powerful and wealthy people came into conflict with even their children, the latter who'd gotten past adolescence and into adulthood, yet were struggling for their current place in society. And thus what were these young people going to do after all their behavior's of rebellion from privilege, and the choices that privilege was forcing upon many of them at a time of war. So he is not singing about just one woman, and he is repeating the rolling stone because of its symbolism and history, and to a bunch of folks of his own generation, to say what are you going to do now? A song of reflection, that now that you're own your own, that you have the freedom that you have, he wonders what will be chosen from here. |
Deucey | 21 Oct 2021 5:01 a.m. PST |
|
Parzival | 21 Oct 2021 12:15 p.m. PST |
I think you're giving Dylan too much credit. It comes across as one of those songs that people nod and say, ‘that's deep, man, really deep." And then you ask them "What's deep about it?", and they can't give you a cogent answer. I'm not saying you're wrong (or that your answer isn't cogent), but I do think you're reading a lot into the song that's not evidently there. Now, if Dylan later said that's what the song was about, okay. But to me, reading the lyrics, and having heard him sing it, I think it's a bit more personal, either actually about a specific person whom he has watched crash (and in which crash he seems to take a little too much satisfaction), or about "selling out" in general, probably among fellow "folk" or "protest" singers (and maybe even himself). As a generational statement, I dunno. Maybe? In any case, if that's the point, I think he missed his targets, winding up with a song people sing snatches of without either grasping what it means or even caring. Which is the case with most "meaningful" songs. But then, it's not the nature of a song to be understood or to put forth any sort of logical argument. |
DJCoaltrain | 21 Oct 2021 12:57 p.m. PST |
In order to sell out you gotta have something to sell. The downtrodden of American Society got nothing to sell. If they had anything, they'd willingly sell it. As for me, "Hillbilly Elegy" says it all. Personally, I find it very difficult to believe anyone worth $350 USD million has any intimate knowledge of those being crushed by generational poverty. Jus Sayin. |
von Schwartz ver 2 | 21 Oct 2021 5:34 p.m. PST |
Didn't the Stones cover this one too? |
robert piepenbrink | 21 Oct 2021 6:17 p.m. PST |
If a writer--including a songwriter--has to explain what he wrote, he's failed as a writer. I'm not sure Dylan COULD explain what he wrote. He's also 33 years behind "Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?" |
Editor in Chief Bill | 21 Oct 2021 11:41 p.m. PST |
Some say the mystery tramp is Christ. Others say it is a rhyming substitution for 'enemy camp'. |
John the OFM | 21 Oct 2021 11:59 p.m. PST |
Or he could have been stoned when he wrote it. |
GamesPoet | 22 Oct 2021 4:10 a.m. PST |
The song does seem to work on a personal level, and of course it came from experience, perhaps more than one experience, perhaps a collection of experiences that added up, of which he witnessed outside himself, maybe questioning himself, and perhaps a combination of all of these. There are those that claim the song is about a specific person, and that is certainly possible, yet perhaps more than one, especially since more than one is mentioned, and the relationship(s) between people, and what people obtain in such situations, and how fleeting that can be. Will they learn, and how will they move forward? And when different people can relate to the repetitiveness of the chorus, especially to those who were showing up to his concerts, its not surprising for a generational association to come out of it, on purpose or not, it happened, and he already was aware of his own influence on that, which I'll mention what that was causing shortly. As for being 33 years behind, the first references to this kind of stuff goes much further back, at least into the 1500s some say as far back as the 1000s, and some say all the way back to Publilius Syrus, BC. However, that doesn't mean Dylan was thinking of any of that, although using the rolling stone reference repeatedly doesn't show it to be an accident. And the idea that such themes are something that is part of the human condition, shows that it doesn't take 350 million dollars to see it, which I suspect he didn't have at the time of the release of this music, when he was needling at that condition through at a minimum personal experience and perspective. And while being around the time when Dylan himself was beginning to question his own path, even considering quitting music. Additionally, suspect that Dylan can explain what he writes, and from multiple interviews, it seems he does so with resistance, and seems to answer only to the extent that he seems to be willing to share. So there are lots of questions, and lots of answers. I have at least 5 responses in this post. ; ) |
Deucey | 22 Oct 2021 5:26 a.m. PST |
So what does the original poll question mean? |
DJCoaltrain | 22 Oct 2021 11:07 a.m. PST |
John the OFM – Like most of the musicians from the 60s. |
robert piepenbrink | 22 Oct 2021 5:19 p.m. PST |
Reversals of fortune certainly go back a bit. But my point, GamesPoet, is that to the extent I can make out what he's talking about, it had already been done much better by previous composers and singers. You only do another version of "Romeo and Juliet" if you think you can top Shakespeare. |
GamesPoet | 23 Oct 2021 2:19 a.m. PST |
If Dylan's song is only being seen as a reversal of fortune situation, then yes, what's been made out has been missed. Even so, during the Great Depression there were a lot more folks who farmed and labored and soldiered that had to wait in bread lines while those who lived in the upper class, where some say the choices were made that impacted the majority who suffered, yet it was the majority that was providing and protecting for all. Some might say the working class didn't make good choices either, but Dylan's song was not about either of those perspectives on the economics of the times. However, the authors of both songs do seem to be speaking of choices, and calling for folks to contemplate. |
|