Help support TMP


"Do You Use "Historically Accurate" Middle Earth Armies?" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Return to the Do You Use "Historically Accurate" Middle Earth Armies? Poll


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Risus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Report from ReaperCon 2006

Michael Cannon reports from last May's ReaperCon 2006.


807 hits since 6 Dec 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP06 Dec 2017 5:49 a.m. PST

Having said "I don't game Middle Earth" I'll hedge. I have some fantasy armies, and some--halflings, dwarves, orcs and goblins--certainly have a strong Tolkien influence. But in my experience fantasy authors almost never give you the detail you'd want for a decent scenario, and the same is true of SF writers. Most of the exceptions are actually stealing historical battles. Of course, this is usually true of medieval chroniclers as well.

So all my fantasy and medieval battles are just interesting battles, not attempts to recreate either Bosworth or the Battle of Five Armies. I don't have the information. Historical armies are types which usually went together, and fantasy armies are unified by theme and troop types. Specific named commanders? Usually not before the 17th Century.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.