"Critical Mass" Topic
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Critical Mass Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
|advocate||12 Jan 2019 6:31 a.m. PST|
All of the things – but sometimes it might be in combination with other players.
|Cerdic ||12 Jan 2019 6:58 a.m. PST|
I would say the minimum is…
A surface to play on
Enough figures for two sides
|Winston Smith||12 Jan 2019 8:20 a.m. PST|
Interest in the period. To me that's the most important thing.
I went into massive British Napoleonic projects twice. Each time it was because the club I was in was doing Nappies and I wanted to contribute.
Each time I discovered that I had little interest in my project and sold them to someone who did.
|robert piepenbrink ||12 Jan 2019 8:39 a.m. PST|
No miniature wargame happens without
a board (including terrain)
rules (including necessary markers, randomizers and measuring devices)
a scenario and
troops for two sides.
I'll grant you these can be pretty rough and ready, especially early on.
But Winston's right: if the period--or the rules someone else insists on--won't keep your interest, it doesn't really matter how good-looking the troops and terrain are.
| Parzival ||12 Jan 2019 9:14 a.m. PST|
I don't need to have any of the things to play a milieu. Someone else certainly can provide them!
(Of course, being infected with "dragon hoarding disease," I'll probably wind up acquiring it all anyway.)
I'm a hoarder of hordes!