/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory

"Do You Read Rulebooks for Fun?" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Do You Read Rulebooks for Fun? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase Article The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.
Featured Workbench Article Scratch-builders often need basic wood shapes. Here is what is available inexpensively at the dollar store.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
langobard | 02 Dec 2019 4:57 a.m. PST |
As others noted in the original discussion, I'm not sure that 'fun' is quite the word I'd use. I am always interested in game mechanics and how these are implemented, but also, I do like reading army lists (especially ancients) to see how various armies are represented in a given rule set. |
robert piepenbrink  | 02 Dec 2019 6:57 a.m. PST |
I do still read rulebooks for fun--but not current rulebooks. "Charge!" was fun. "Lion Rampant"--though a nice game--was no fun to read. "Not any more" was the best I could do. |
ochoin  | 02 Dec 2019 8:07 a.m. PST |
I used to struggle through the often poorly written efforts of yesteryear: Empire? etc However, many modern efforts such as 'General d'Armee' or 'The Men Who Would Be Kings' for example are lucid, detailed, often humorous & clever in their mechanisms. so, yes, I read modern rule books for fun. |
The Last Conformist | 05 Dec 2019 10:33 p.m. PST |
Sometimes: but more commonly army lists. |
|