"The Day After Tomorrow" Topic

I used to do it a lot but not for some time so my other would probably be 'Not any more'

x42

Not often enough.

advocate +1

I guess if this includes things like campaigns where the outcome of one battle influences the next (i.e. the Guards Brigade are not quite as big as they used to be, having been shot to pieces in the previous battle) I would go with Advocate

Not for several decades. Campaigns swallowed time and produced lop-sided battles. I'm careful to retain the capacity for simple "battle-generator" campaigns, but I don't know that I'll ever use it.

I did both several Zulu war and Sudan campaigns before I retired. None since then. I sometimes think about going back to work so I'll have more free time. It's a contradiction, I know.

Answered "rarely", but it's probably over two decades since last. It's one of those things I'd like to do but never get round to.

Have not played a campaign game for several years.

I don't get the "(1 hour, 8 hours, until one side surrenders. etc.)" part of this poll. That is not what I consider a campaign. Basically there are three types.

One is you have a strategic movement map and you move on it until two opposing units end up at the same place and you fight a battle. You continue until one side achieves a strategic victory.

Another type is just playing the historic battles in a campaign one at a time. Nothing carries over. My most recent one of those was the Antietam Campaign.

The third type is one I am doing now which is a series of battles set up by the GM. No strategic map movement but some things do carry over to the next game. I am doing a French Colonial North Africa campaign.

I only do the latter two because the first type usually just peters out when one side decides they are not going to play any more because they are losing the campaign.