Help support TMP


"Court rules only 0.9% died of Covid" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Workbench Article

Which Primer Should You Use on Your Model?

A paint manufacturer explains about primers.


Featured Profile Article

Mini Wooden Palettes

Building blocks?


Current Poll


832 hits since 9 Aug 2021
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

USAFpilot10 Aug 2021 12:39 p.m. PST

link

Lisbon court rules only 0.9% of ‘verified cases' died of COVID, numbering 152, not 17,000 claimed

Following a citizen's petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data, reports AndreDias.net.

According to the ruling, the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.

All the "others" died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.

"We live in a fraud of unprecedented dimensions," wrote Dias.
The data are from the Sistema de Informação dos Certificados de Óbito (Death Certificate Information System – SICO), the only such system in Portugal. The reference to 152 death certificated issued ‘under Justice Ministry supervision' is spurious, as all death certificates are issued under Justice Ministry auspices, being the only institution that issues them.

"In response to a popular suit, a court order was required for the Ministry to respond, desperate not to denounce the fraud.

"All those responsible for handling data from ‘cases' and ‘deaths' can, thereafter, only be tried for the crime if there is any dignity remaining in the rule of law," he continued.

"If these figures are of the same order of magnitude for other countries as well, and there is no reason to assume otherwise, then the plague is a deception of unprecedented proportions and crimes committed against humanity on a huge scale have been committed here."

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2021 2:03 p.m. PST

Oh, so now judges are the arbiters of Science.
Why are you willing to accept the verdicts of Portuguese judges? I'm sure, judging by past posts of yours, that you would be totally unwilling to accept rulings of American judges in any cases you don't agree with.
Par for the course.

USAFpilot10 Aug 2021 2:42 p.m. PST

I post an article for discussion and instead of making a cogent argument about the facts you go right to the ad hominem attack. Argue the facts; not the person.

Nick Bowler10 Aug 2021 3:59 p.m. PST

Several fact check sites say this is false. link

USAFpilot10 Aug 2021 4:05 p.m. PST

Thanks Nick. Just goes to show you fake news is everywhere. (Of course it raises the question of ‘who fact checks the fact checkers?'.)

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2021 8:20 p.m. PST

"Fake news" is in the eye and ideology of the beholder.
Quis custodiet upsos custodies?

USAFpilot10 Aug 2021 8:59 p.m. PST

"His answer to "the great problem of Government", namely "quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" or, as he translated it, "Who are to watch the watchmen?" was to give ultimate oversight to "the people themselves"."

Let the people decide. Let the people have all the information free of censorship from big brother. There will be disagreements. It only gets scary when everyone is of the same mind.

altfritz11 Aug 2021 3:32 p.m. PST


- Max: You killed him?
- Vincent: No, I shot him. Bullets and the fall killed him.

Oddball16 Aug 2021 7:48 a.m. PST

Nick Bowler,

Did you use this site for "fact checks"?

link

Just curious?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.