Help support TMP


"motion to view the eclipse.. denied " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to The Law Plus Board



251 hits since 20 Aug 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP21 Aug 2017 6:21 a.m. PST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 8:17-cr-266-T-23JSS

JOSEPH BISHOP

ORDER

Definitely recurrent, sometimes consequential, and occasionally spectacular, the solar eclipse understandably occupies a provocative and luminous place in history and in art. For example, Herodotus reports that a solar eclipse during the war between the Medes and the Lydians caused the combatants, who interpreted the eclipse as a divine omen, to suspend hostilities and to negotiate peace. In Borodin's magnificent opera, an eclipse portends disaster for Prince Igor's military campaign against the Polovtsians. In a popular 1970s song, the splendid Carly Simon introduced the attendance of a former suitor (reportedly the actor Warren Beatty) at a solar eclipse as probative evidence of his putatively insufferable vanity:

Well I hear you went to Saratoga And your horse, naturally, won
Then you flew your Learjet up to Nova Scotia To see the total eclipse of the sun
Well, you're where you should be all the time
And when you're not, you're with some underworld spy Or the wife of a close friend,
Wife of a close friend, and You're so vain
You probably think this song is about you

On a higher plane, Wordsworth wrote about an eclipse in 1820:

High on her speculative tower Stood Science waiting for the hour When Sol was destined to endure That darkening of his radiant face

The solar eclipse is no longer mysterious, supernatural, foreboding, or ominous (or even "total"; owing to the solar corona, the darkness of a "total" eclipse is only partial). An eclipse is just another astral event, precisely predictable since the day the Babylonians discovered the governing formula (although some contend for an earlier discovery).
On this occasion, an Assistant United States Attorney boldly moves (where no AUSA has moved before) to postpone a trial because an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, has pre-paid the cost of visiting the zone of "totality" of a solar eclipse that will occur on August 21 (about the eclipse, the motion oddly uses the phrase "scheduled to occur," as if someone arbitrarily set the eclipse, as an impresario sets a performer, to appear at a chosen time and place, subject always to some unstated exigency).* Cruel fate has dictated that the August 21 eclipse will occur during the trial of an action in which the agent is a principal participant on behalf of the United States.
In any particular month, about four-hundred actions pend before each active district judge in the Middle District of Florida; each action typically involves several lawyers, at least two parties, and an array of witnesses. A trial prompts the clerk to summon scores of potential jurors. The present motion proposes to subordinate the time and resources of the court, of the opposing counsel, of the witnesses, and of the jurors to one person's aspiration to view a "total" solar eclipse for no more than two minutes and forty-two seconds. To state the issue distinctly is to resolve the issue decisively.
When an indispensable participant, knowing that a trial is imminent, pre-pays for some personal indulgence, that participant, in effect, lays in a bet. This time, unlike Carly Simon's former suitor, whose "horse, naturally, won," this bettor's horse has naturally lost. The motion (Doc. 31) is DENIED.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on August 18, 2017.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP21 Aug 2017 6:28 a.m. PST

evil grin

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP21 Aug 2017 6:40 a.m. PST

Can't win 'em all….:-)

Old Wolfman22 Aug 2017 5:37 a.m. PST

I was inside my workplace during the event,myself. Sun's position was likely directly over the building,give or take 10 degrees west angle,only 91% coverage where I was. Bit of a yawner. Plenty of tall buildings also playing their part in my locale.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP23 Aug 2017 8:12 a.m. PST

His appeal will be heard in January.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP23 Aug 2017 8:53 a.m. PST

On the other hand it could be argued that the judge abused his authority to no good purpose. Many law enforcement officers must sacrifice their own personal time off to testify in court hearings, and this agent was now being forced to do the same, for an action that had no pressing reason to occur on the same day as the eclipse. Also, an ATF agent is not the equivalent of Warren Beatty, or whatever elite snob was meant by Simon's song, and likely has very limited money to spend on a plane ticket to anywhere, regardless of the reason (and certainly way less funds than the judge). In short, this judge pulled a power play because he could, and got all cutesy and overly clever so he could get press coverage.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.