"la la land" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Movies Plus Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Profile Article Do you do so much file work that your fingers hurt? Maybe this tool can help...
Current Poll
|
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 31 Dec 2016 6:56 p.m. PST |
My surprise favorite of the year, a comedy-romance and homage to the MGM musicals from the '50s. Great escapist fare and the perfect movie for date night. Read my review here: link |
| 15th Hussar | 31 Dec 2016 7:07 p.m. PST |
I'll go with Weasel or HvS to see this, but only if they buy me a real fancy dinner first…like Arby's or Golden Corral or some such. |
| Winston Smith | 31 Dec 2016 8:13 p.m. PST |
You may be easy but you're not cheap. |
| 15th Hussar | 01 Jan 2017 2:43 a.m. PST |
|
| lugal hdan | 01 Jan 2017 8:44 a.m. PST |
I saw it last night, and while I enjoyed it well enough, my "MGM Musical Lovin' Wife" (tm) thought it was a near miss. |
| Mithmee | 01 Jan 2017 8:46 a.m. PST |
Sorry will not be seeing this. |
| Schogun | 01 Jan 2017 8:48 a.m. PST |
Saw it last night. ======================================== MINOR SPOILER ALERT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ======================================== I was worried after the two big production numbers that smashed into me right at the beginning (great camera work though on the first one!), but once it settled down, it was very enjoyable. My wife didn't like the ending though. |
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 01 Jan 2017 2:48 p.m. PST |
What???!!! Get out, Arbys is very affordable! My wife didn't like the ending though. That's probably because the movie shifted in tone from a bright and cheerful MGM musical to a Jacques Demy downer. I had no problem with it. The movie's more poignant and indelible for it. Here's an excellent "second look" review from a much better critic than I. I find his analysis to be impeccable: link |
|
