Help support TMP


"NASA Peer Reviewed EM Drive Paper Published" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Profile Article

Crafter's Square Wood Shapes

Need something to base your scenics on? Look in the craft aisle…


Featured Book Review


480 hits since 22 Nov 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP22 Nov 2016 8:51 a.m. PST

And so far, it still moves.

Link to paper: link

And a more layman's article: link

Next: Test it in space.

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP22 Nov 2016 9:10 a.m. PST

Magic!

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP22 Nov 2016 11:22 a.m. PST

To quote a well-known (albeit fictional) alien:

"Fascinating…"

Winston Smith22 Nov 2016 3:18 p.m. PST

Sure it does.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP22 Nov 2016 4:07 p.m. PST

To be fair and balanced, here is a more negative critique and analysis of the paper and its claims: arstechnica.com/science/2016/11/nasas-em-drive-still-a-WTF-thruster

EDIT. Well, the bleep-o-matic bleeped the authors use of a certain WT(another initial here) acronym in the title. Dang it, Bleep-o-matic, it's not my fault. I think I've managed to restore the link.

The G Dog Fezian04 Dec 2016 7:31 a.m. PST

I'll believe it when a ship powered by an EM drive enters Mars orbit.

Bowman04 Dec 2016 10:59 a.m. PST

At 1.2 microN per kiloWatt that won't happen anytime soon.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP05 Dec 2016 8:53 a.m. PST

It's 1.2 MILLInewtons. You're off by an order of magnitude, Bowman. The thrust, if it's real, is greater than a solar sail, which is a viable interplanetary craft.

Bowman05 Dec 2016 12:37 p.m. PST

You are right, it's 1.6 micro N per Watt, not kiloWatt. Or milli N per kiloWatt. That makes me off by only a factor of a thousand!wink

It's the light sails that are in the micro N per kiloWatt range.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.