Help support TMP


"Doing Loops in a Tomorrowland Jet Pack Might Kill You" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Tree Base from Wooden Wheel & Clay

Basing an inexpensive tree with a toy wheel and some clay.


Featured Profile Article

How Scurvy Got His "Style"

How Scurvy developed his unique approach to miniatures.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


421 hits since 3 Mar 2016
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0103 Mar 2016 8:39 p.m. PST

"Yes, there are jet packs in the movie Tomorrowland. I don't think that's really a spoiler since you see jet packs in the trailer. Also, I'll be honest—I think these might be rocket packs instead of jet packs (rocket packs don't need external fuel like air).

But who really cares how these jet packs work since they might kill you. I'm not talking about crashing into the ground killing—I mean just plain turning too fast killing you. Yes, it's true. If you have too large of an acceleration—even if you are still in the air, it could kill you.

In this case it would be the acceleration caused by the circular motion of these vertical loops…"

picture

Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

jpattern203 Mar 2016 8:54 p.m. PST

Welcome back, Armand.

When I get my jet pack, or rocket pack, I promise I won't do any loops, or make any rapid changes in direction or speed. Nice and easy, that'll be my style. laugh

Great War Ace04 Mar 2016 7:53 a.m. PST

Horizontal attitude is really stupid and just partakes of "I'm Superman" aesthetics.

A jet/rocket pack would require almost one hundred percent of its thrust just to keep the passenger aloft. Only a teensy fraction of the energy would be used to go horizontally and change direction; well, aside from "up", that is; each time you increase altitude you engage huge amounts of available energy and thus use up huge amounts of fuel. But horizontal directional changes are small uses of both. Increasing speed without losing altitude would be another biggie fuel consumer.

You would never want to do a loop. Because once over the top and starting down, all you do is drop like a rock. And any propulsion would increase the drop. Pulling out of that one really would be problematic. The Gs alone would kill you unless you had miles to recover.

I can see a "flip", where you go up and suddenly shut off the power as you kick your legs out in a swinging motion, and rotate around your pack; then as you drop feet first, you reengage the power and arrest the drop. Why? For showing off, of course.

Packs don't fly like aircraft with fixed wings. They are more like helicopters but with thrust instead of lift from rotating blades….

Zargon04 Mar 2016 8:51 a.m. PST

Look Ma no hands… sPlAt!!

Tango0104 Mar 2016 10:51 a.m. PST

Thanks my friend!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

zoneofcontrol04 Mar 2016 5:18 p.m. PST

Welcome home Armand, we missed you.

If you by me a jet pack I will test it out and let you know…

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.