| tkdguy | 29 Nov 2013 9:01 p.m. PST |
I just saw this on the news, and it got me mad. An online store called KlearGear imposed a fine on a couple who posted a negative review. link This is definitely harassment. I'm glad someone stepped in on the couple's behalf. I hope the couple gets every penny they're suing for. Don't expect me to place an order from that company. |
| GarrisonMiniatures | 29 Nov 2013 9:32 p.m. PST |
When I originally read this elsewhere, I'm sure it said one of the couple had bouht te item whilst the other one filed the review, so I was never certain how there could have been a breach in the first place. Certainly not a company to do business with. |
| britishlinescarlet2 | 30 Nov 2013 12:41 a.m. PST |
|
| Space Monkey | 30 Nov 2013 12:54 a.m. PST |
Our corporate rulers will not tolerate dissent.
You will not speak ill of the product.
All praise the product! |
| Streitax | 30 Nov 2013 2:52 a.m. PST |
The product is double plus good. Even if they don't send it to you. |
| Rrobbyrobot | 30 Nov 2013 6:32 a.m. PST |
Thanks for the heads up. Companies like this make my trigger finger itch. |
| tkdguy | 30 Nov 2013 5:49 p.m. PST |
From what I've heard the company got in trouble with the Better Business Bureau for falsely claiming they had an A+ rating on their website. |
| Jemima Fawr | 30 Nov 2013 11:27 p.m. PST |
They should have given a positive product review like this one on Amazon: This review is from: Barrettine Methylated Spirit 500ml (Misc.) From the moment you remove the cap you realise you're in for a treat. Fresh, bright, smoky, with a mineral edge and rounded, fruity nose. Midweight and bold, possessing some edge and no little bite, yet remaining smooth, balanced and satisfying. This is a drink to enjoy with friends in a park. Highly recommended. link |
| tkdguy | 01 Dec 2013 12:20 a.m. PST |
Hard to give a positive review when you never receive your order. |
 etotheipi  | 01 Dec 2013 6:35 a.m. PST |
I can't believe that the company was able to file the debt with the credit agencies without any actual evidence of an obligation. Does anyone know what the criterion for that is? |
| Mako11 | 01 Dec 2013 9:58 p.m. PST |
Credit agencies seem to have little to no controls, and are horrible at correcting mistakes, apparently, based upon a number of in depth stories I've seen about them on the news. |
| etotheipi | 02 Dec 2013 4:31 a.m. PST |
I wonder what it would take to have a class action suit against them? Not only are individuals harmed, but pretty much anyone in the market is harmed when someone is denied resources based on false information… |
| Mako11 | 10 Dec 2013 3:16 a.m. PST |
Theoretically, if the report they made was factual, the company won't have a leg to stand on. However, court cases, and judges/juries are more like crap shoots than fair hearings, based upon my observations. |
worries about not losing his rules stuff.