John the OFM | 20 May 2011 9:08 a.m. PST |
The more successful an author gets, the harder it becomes to not crank out 1200 page tomes. How many "trilogies" have you seen where Book One has 600 pages, and by the time it gets to Volume 5 there are 1200 pages? By this time, the only function of the book editor is to keep the spelling consistent. No one can tell a "successful" writer that he/she needs to cut 200 pages. "Do you know who you are talking to???" I nominate Tom Clancy, of course. Hunt for Red October was NOT a bloated mess. The Bear and the Dragon? Decidedly so. So
What authors would you nominate for the Tom Clancy Don't Need No Stinkin' Editor Award? Too bad I can't cross-post to Polls. 8^) |
Tacitus | 20 May 2011 9:14 a.m. PST |
You were able to finish The Bear and the Dragon? Better than my three attempts. How about George R.R. Martin? |
Connard Sage | 20 May 2011 9:16 a.m. PST |
Stephen King Carrie ~250pp The Stand ~1400pp |
Parzival ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 20 May 2011 9:25 a.m. PST |
Tolkien. I love the man's work, but Bombadil needed to go. There's an interesting quote in the bio from the extended LotR DVDs. I can't recall the speaker, but the quote was, "One did not edit Tolkien." Being the Merlon Professor of English Literature and Language at Oxford tended to give Tolkien an intimidation factor that I doubt many editors could have stood up against. It would have taken a brave man to tell Tolkien he didn't know what he was writing. |
coryfromMissoula | 20 May 2011 9:26 a.m. PST |
The hack from Wheel of Time fantasy series – not just extra pages in a book but extra books as well. Of course books sell and pages cost, so that may have been editors bowing to marketing. |
Ed Mohrmann ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 20 May 2011 9:37 a.m. PST |
OFM – there are SOOOOOO MANY ! Y' want 'em in alphabetical order, chronological order, or what ???? BTW, most of Clancy after _Red Storm Rising_ ain't worth the effort (_ Without Remorse_, a notable exception, although the book could use signifcant blue-penciling
) |
richarDISNEY | 20 May 2011 9:40 a.m. PST |
Toliken Rowling.
![beer beer](boards/icons/beer.gif) |
John the OFM | 20 May 2011 9:44 a.m. PST |
I'm going to work now. Enjoy yourselves and play nice. |
Farstar | 20 May 2011 9:47 a.m. PST |
The whole logarhea crowd, really. In SF&F that starts with Eddings and Brooks, moves to Jordan, Rowling, Goodkind, Gear, Gentle, later Feist, and a few others. I could add to the list by taking a quick look at the bookstore shelves. I don't read a lot of "General Fiction" written after I was born because it hits Sturgeon's Law with a vengeance, but Barker and King come to mind, as does Clancy. Some of these are misplaced SF&F, of course, but that's another rant for another post. |
Connard Sage | 20 May 2011 10:28 a.m. PST |
And Patricia Cornwell. Not because she writes massively inflated tomes, but because Kay Scarpetta es me off mightily. Every book someone's gunning for Kay and I'm cheering them on. Ditto Kathy Reichs. *ahem* sorry, that should have gone on 'Ranting' |
Mapleleaf | 20 May 2011 11:31 a.m. PST |
Harry Turtledove He takes one story such as the South Winning the Civil War and adrags it out to an 11 book marathon. |
20thmaine ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 20 May 2011 11:41 a.m. PST |
Is stephen king still writing books ? I thought they were novelty house bricks – build a room that looks like a library kind of idea
. |
Streitax | 20 May 2011 2:48 p.m. PST |
Of course King is still writing, he's never finished a story yet. They just seem to peter out and bleed into the next one. |
Space Monkey | 20 May 2011 3:00 p.m. PST |
I much prefer King and Barker in short story mode
To my mind most horror novels would work better as short stories
but anthologies of shorter works don't seem to sell well. |
mweaver | 20 May 2011 10:20 p.m. PST |
The first author where I spotted this problem was Alastair MacLean – his last few books were terrible (not particularly long, just weak). David Webber is a classic example, certainly. |
Roderick Robertson ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 20 May 2011 11:10 p.m. PST |
David Weber, definitely. Edit out the 6-page internal dialogs which occur between the detection of the enemy launching missiles, and the first counter-measures firing, PLEASE! Terry Pratchett's books have doubled in size over time, but in a good way! |
The G Dog ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 21 May 2011 2:30 p.m. PST |
Weber is the name that jumps to mind. The Honor Harrington stuff has gotten way too bloated with all the internal references back to events from the previous books. |
Whatisitgood4atwork | 21 May 2011 4:16 p.m. PST |
I think the last two books of the Harry Potter saga suffered from the syndrome you mention. |
Sane Max | 23 May 2011 6:02 a.m. PST |
Len Deighton writes book, sends it in, they print it, muppets buy them regardless. My dad is a literate chap and he is CERTAIN that Deighton is in fact two authors – one, who writes in Deighton Style'a' and is good, and the other who uses a completely different style and is . Pat |
jtkimmel | 23 May 2011 7:21 a.m. PST |
The hack from Wheel of Time fantasy series – not just extra pages in a book but extra books as well. Robert Jordan, I would go with him as well. Series started out well enough but just kept getting more complicated and adding more characters (kind of like the Heroes tv show). Here's a hint: when a 1000+ page book only spends a chapter or two on each person/place, there are too many characters! I never bought the last two books he wrote, then he died and his son said there will be 2-3 more books to finish the story, I gave up. |
Last Hussar | 25 May 2011 4:47 p.m. PST |
Hey, didn't you know. We've got the internet now! ANYONE can be an author. We don't need no 'elites' telling us how to do it. |