Help support TMP


"Momma don't take my Kodachrome away.. oh well" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Obituaries Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Workbench Article

Plastic Tablecloth River

Can you make a river from an inexpensive plastic tablecloth?


Featured Profile Article

Galloping Jack Reports from CanCon

Mal Wright Fezian journeys to and from the Australian national convention - and tells us what he thinks of panicking tank hordes and flat terrain!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


340 hits since 22 Jun 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Wyatt the Odd Fezian22 Jun 2009 5:12 p.m. PST

After 74 years and countless millions of memorable images, Kodak will be discontinuing production of the iconic film.

link

Demand had fallen so much that it was only produced one day out of the year and there is only one laboratory left capable of processing it.

This follows a decision made earlier this year by Polaroid to cease production of its instant film.

Wyatt

Chthoniid22 Jun 2009 5:23 p.m. PST

It was somewhat inevitable.

On the plus side, I really like the new Kodak Portra films. The 160VC and 160NC are superb for those of use still shooting with film-SLRs.

Personal logo Saginaw Supporting Member of TMP22 Jun 2009 5:34 p.m. PST

I read about this earlier today, and was going to post it here. Thanks for posting it, Wyatt. thumbs up

The top digital cameras would now probably supersede and give better quality when measured mathematically, but aesthetically Kodachrome had something you just can't reproduce digitally.

This particular paragraph stands out to me, and reminds me of the special effects used in contemporary movies. A generation ago and before, SFX was achieved through many imaginative means, such as cel animation, miniature models, and so on, creating a kind of "movie magic" that fueled so many imaginations. With today's glut of CGI and digital reproduction, the aesthetic, humanistic edge has been lost, creating an artificial result. In my view, in trying to create the most realistic effect possible, the result becomes unrealistic, and rather unbelievable. This is one of many reasons why I'm such a severe critic of today's entertainment.

Anyway, RIP Kodachrome, and thanks for the memories.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP22 Jun 2009 8:59 p.m. PST

Another step backwards for "progress."

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.