Help support TMP


"I'm in love" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Comics and Graphic Novels Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Back to the Plastic Forest

More exotic landscape items from the dollar store!


Featured Profile Article

Editor Gwen's 2nd Wargaming Video

Personal logo Editor Gwen The Editor of TMP returns to make another successful wargaming video.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


817 hits since 7 May 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Gunfreak07 May 2009 11:32 a.m. PST

A few days ago I came over this webcomic

link
And after reading about 80 of them I fell madly in love with the character of Faye, she is just so cool yet vulnerable and flawed. I've now gotten to 461 in the comic and still I love her.

This is the first time I've gotten a crush on something drawn since I had a crush on gadget from rescue rangers when I was 4. atleast this one is human.

Jovian107 May 2009 12:44 p.m. PST

Funny – thanks for the link – now I'll be up til 2 reading the dang thing!

Jerzei Balowski07 May 2009 1:15 p.m. PST

I happen to like the young lady in that "scrunchies" ad on the site … thumbs up

Twisted Metal07 May 2009 1:32 p.m. PST

Ok, I had to enable all the scripts on the site to eventually see the scrunchies ad. But it was worth it.

The comic is cool too!

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian07 May 2009 2:16 p.m. PST

Extreme truth: link

Daffy Doug07 May 2009 3:35 p.m. PST

#30 made me laugh.

Weird how the style changes….

The Nigerian Lead Minister07 May 2009 5:34 p.m. PST

That's a good comic, I'll have to add it to the ones I've been working through. Thanks for the link.

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP07 May 2009 8:53 p.m. PST

atleast this one is human.

No, not really.

Mardaddy07 May 2009 11:08 p.m. PST

Been a fan of that for a looooooong time. Faye is an awesome character, love her "job!"

Gunfreak08 May 2009 6:13 a.m. PST

"No, not really"

I mean she looks human, gadget is a Bleeped texting mouse,

Farstar08 May 2009 9:36 a.m. PST

Faye's backstory takes a long time to hit the page.

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP08 May 2009 4:16 p.m. PST

Hmmm.

Listen to this while you pine for your inky ingenue.
YouTube link

Gunfreak11 May 2009 6:53 a.m. PST

I've gone thought all 1400+ strips now,
And now I'm sad, because from now on I only get to read one a day, the last few days I've been reading like 100-150 a day

Farstar11 May 2009 1:45 p.m. PST

"Weird how the style changes…"

The art style? The FAQ mentions that the artist has, shockingly, been getting better as he goes. 1400 strips with no change would be pre-meditation by an accomplished artist. What this strip shows us is the progress of an amateur.

It's contant, too. Even since the middle of the strip's life, there has been improvement. When first introduced Hannelore was of ambiguous age compared to the rest of the cast. Now she is clearly at the young end of the cast (which is the case; she's 22 while Dora's brother is taking a running charge at 30 and the rest are somewhere in between, Library girl, Raven, and Steve's redhead being the exceptions at the younger end).

What amused and scared me was the last panel of the strip where Raven gets hired for good. I know *one* gal who is all three of the women in that panel, depending on mood.

Daffy Doug12 May 2009 8:13 a.m. PST

Yeah, the art style changing is always weird. Look at Peanuts, how Schultz changed the characters. Calvin and Hobbes, only a little change, really; Waterson was very, very good from the getgo of that strip.

The thing that threw me about this strip though is the way the later style popped up at no. 24: just one example of the later, smoother drawing, and then a whole string of back to the rudimentary style. What is up with that I wonder?

Farstar12 May 2009 10:46 a.m. PST

#24 was a guest strip.

Daffy Doug14 May 2009 8:26 a.m. PST

Ah, yes, I noticed a bunch more of those later on. What threw me is that #24 looks quite a bit like the later style, only stuck in there very early.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.