""Standard" Screen Resolution" Topic
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Webmasters Plus Board
The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 8 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.
|Ditto Tango 2 1 ||07 Dec 2008 1:41 p.m. PST|
What's the standard now? I'm in the process of redeisgning and eventually migrating my website (full of broken links) and would like to change my collage jpg I use as a site map ( ucs.mun.ca/~tmarshal ) and make it wider.
SOme years ago, the "standard" was 800 by 600, but many people use higher resolutions now. I design Oracle applications for a local network using a front end that doesn't handle resizing that seamlessly and I used to design apps in 800 by 600 then as well, but now find I can get away with at least 1024 by 768 for screen real estate.
Thanks for any thoughts.
|fred12df||07 Dec 2008 2:21 p.m. PST|
I've just looked at the stats for my hobby website – and for over 3000 visits, only 5% of users are on 800x600
40% are on 1024x768 and another 40% on 1280x800 or 1024, with the rest on something higher.
|CPBelt||07 Dec 2008 3:35 p.m. PST|
I use 1024x768 on my home monitor. My work flat screen is set higher--I have no idea to what. Even back in the wee days of the WWW, I have never liked background images. Fred's stats are about right over all.
|the Gorb ||07 Dec 2008 5:23 p.m. PST|
1024x768 on a regular monitor.
Recently upgraded all the monitors at home to wide screens. They run 1280x768.
Regards, the Gorb
|pphalen ||07 Dec 2008 8:34 p.m. PST|
I think you will be safe considereing 1024 x 768 as a "standard"
| Andrew Walters ||08 Dec 2008 10:11 a.m. PST|
The new standard is no standard (slightly better than the old standard of competing standards). You're safe with 1024x768, but iMacs have *started* at 1680x1050 for a while now.
|Ditto Tango 2 1 ||09 Dec 2008 1:17 p.m. PST|
Folks, thanks for the responses. I think I'll play with 1024 by 768. I'd love to go higher but don't know how to skrink and grow a jpg display even if that's possible. Still lots more real estate than 800 by 600.
|cosmo1974 ||10 Dec 2008 7:07 a.m. PST|
Just remember that the development for a 1024x768 screen shouldn't be more than 955x600 to account for browser chrome..