Help support TMP


"The new kid on the block" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Webmasters Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

WarStuff


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Little Yellow Clamps

Need some low-pressure clamps?


Featured Workbench Article

Resizing Dungeon Tiles

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian wonders if he can resize 3Dprinted dungeon tiles to match his other dungeon tiles…


Featured Profile Article

Instant Mix Epoxy

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian learns to pay attention to all of the details when buying two-part epoxy...


1,897 hits since 28 Jul 2008
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Saginaw28 Jul 2008 8:46 a.m. PST

link

Comments?

Klebert L Hall28 Jul 2008 9:41 a.m. PST

(a) Stupid product name.

(b) I find little to distinguish different search engines.

(c) Seems like a ridiculous business model but it's worth zillions, so what do I know.
-Kle.

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian28 Jul 2008 9:52 a.m. PST

a) Slow…

b) only shows one result at a time???

nycjadie28 Jul 2008 10:31 a.m. PST

From a branding perspective, I wouldn't recommend CUIL. Nobody will be able to pronounce it. Plus it's just not that catchy. I imagine a 12-year-old saying COOO-Il.

If pictures come up on the search screen, it will indeed be slower than Google.

Not sure I need more sites than Google. I rarely make it through the first 30 hits. What I would find fascinating is a faster and more updated search engine.

Jay Arnold28 Jul 2008 1:35 p.m. PST

No results because of high load…

Due to excessive load, our servers didn't return results. Please try your search again.

Not a good sign.

aecurtis Fezian29 Jul 2008 7:27 a.m. PST

Some initial commentary:

link

Allen

Lentulus29 Jul 2008 7:38 p.m. PST

It works at all at the moment, but more pages, as nycjadie points out, is not what counts. It has to show me more relevant pages that google is not getting.

I doubt pure search really needs much more work. What's needed are engines that can beter understand the user's requirement, and understand the results it delivers to him so it can prioritize them correctly.

In other words a step in AI development, not search capability.

And the pictures are bloody annoying. I saw one I wanted to follow up (it was a guy laying our a game, the search was Franco-Prussian war) and the link from the picture was to a page that didn't have the picture on it. That's just plain stunned.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.