"Advance Order: Battle Missions [40K]" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Advance Order: Battle Missions [40K] News
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article The Editor learns about downloading, printing, and binding a ruleset.
Featured Profile Article How time flies! Another look at trees from the dollar store.
|
Augustus  | 08 Feb 2010 8:03 p.m. PST |
|
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 08 Feb 2010 9:05 p.m. PST |
Really depends on the quality of the missions. |
| Augustus | 08 Feb 2010 9:19 p.m. PST |
|
| Falling Airborne | 08 Feb 2010 10:32 p.m. PST |
Really looking foward to this one. |
| The Hobbybox | 09 Feb 2010 6:29 a.m. PST |
Anything which adds variety is a good thing! From some of the preview stuff I read I think many of the missions are quite 'one sided' so it's about how long you can last, not winning. |
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 09 Feb 2010 9:33 p.m. PST |
Finally GW is moving away from the old both-sides-have-the-same-points-value mindset. |
| Privateer4hire | 10 Feb 2010 6:04 a.m. PST |
They've actually done that for years. They've claimed that you are building the-same-points-value forces but we know that ain't always true (unless you're both playing the same codex--and even then you can min-max). :) |
|
