| legatushedlius | 26 Jan 2012 11:41 p.m. PST |
|
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 27 Jan 2012 3:52 a.m. PST |
Though I think the latest theory is that Triceratops is just a teenage form of another dinosaur. link |
| Gangrel | 27 Jan 2012 5:12 a.m. PST |
The other way around isn't it? Working from memory (can't check the link at work) wasn't it that Chasmosaurus was an immature Triceratops? |
| Editor in Chief Bill | 27 Jan 2012 5:56 a.m. PST |
From the article: Scientists are saying that the Triceratops dinosaur — you know, the three horned one — was actually a juvenile form of a Torosaurus, the three horned dinosaur you don't know. |
| WarWizard | 27 Jan 2012 6:37 a.m. PST |
And the ones with the leather jackets were the juvenile delinquents. |
| LEGION 1950 | 27 Jan 2012 8:04 a.m. PST |
Well again my gates are NOT done!!!!! Mike Adams |
| (I make fun of others) | 27 Jan 2012 8:59 a.m. PST |
Looks a bit like Keith Richards with that skull. |
Stratos  | 27 Jan 2012 9:03 a.m. PST |
Hey Mike, is it February? Have you visited AchesonCreations.com lately and seen the New & Upcoming section? Do you ever read comments to your posts? |
| Kelroy was here | 27 Jan 2012 9:07 a.m. PST |
Though I think the latest theory is that Triceratops is just a teenage form of another dinosaur. This is like when they decided Pluto wasn't a planet anymore. Tell them to stop changing things! |
| (I make fun of others) | 27 Jan 2012 9:18 a.m. PST |
This is like when they decided Pluto wasn't a planet anymore. Because Pluto is so small and has an odd orbit, many astronomers are keen to exclude it from the definition of a full-fledged planet. Trouble is, they can't find any technical way to do so! The most recent attempt is to say Pluto fails the planet test as it has not cleared the neighborhood of its orbit. It's amazing that they assert this with a straight face, as the Earth and Jupiter also have not cleared the neighborhood of their respective orbits (both of those planets share their orbit with asteroids). So, is the Earth not a planet? |
| kallman | 27 Jan 2012 10:47 a.m. PST |
Nice!
Hmmm…my birthday is coming up, there is the whole buy $100.00 USD of product and shipping is free…yea time to talk to the wife. Mike, never give up never surrender. 
But yes, as Stratos stated go check the site because it appears your Roman gates are there. Kim |
| Gangrel | 27 Jan 2012 10:51 a.m. PST |
I stand corrected! Although as Triceratops was defined and named before Torosaurus, it's the latter that gets renamed. |
| LEGION 1950 | 27 Jan 2012 11:19 a.m. PST |
Stratos, did it say what year? These are my comments not yours!!! I have been waiting over 3 years now!!! DO you understand !!!!! Mike Adams |
| (I make fun of others) | 27 Jan 2012 2:05 p.m. PST |
Scientists are saying that the Triceratops dinosaur — you know, the three horned one — was actually a juvenile form of a Torosaurus, the three horned dinosaur you don't know. Workers who focus on the Ceratopian dinosaurs don't believe this to be the case. There are just too many changes in morphology necessary for Triceratops to "become" Torosaurus. It would literally be like fully adult humans developing a fontanelle again, after having the bone grow over in early childhood. |
Augustus  | 29 Jan 2012 6:48 p.m. PST |
|
