Help support TMP


"BBDBA pip assignment rationale" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Hoplites

Another week, another unit for the Amazon army!


Featured Profile Article

June Contest Winner: Hoplite Baggage Vignette

Yesthatphil is the winner of the June 2015 contest with this wonderful entry.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


111 hits since 1 Sep 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
MoogieMite01 Sep 2026 6:44 p.m. PST

I don't understand why in BBDBA, pips are distributed with the high, middle, and low rolls always going to certain commanders. I'm not opposed to it, but I'm missing the nuance. Would someone explain the rationale? Thanks.

lkmjbc301 Sep 2026 10:04 p.m. PST

The game rationale is quite simple. This is a way of creating scarcity of command attention. This quite nicely models more complex systems (order writing, command chits, etc.) of command without the fuss.

The historical rational is somewhat more complex. The scarcity of command imitative for certain commands tends to model some historical battles where more motivated or better lead forces demonstrated more agency in the outcome of the conflict. Again, this is done without complication.

Now, this doesn't perfectly model history. For a better model you need Historical Battle DBA. Battle scenarios there often start with the BBDBA premise, but modify it to meet the historical context. Great commander for instance may be able to change the commands receiving the order of dice awards mid-battle. They may be able to add more pips to certain commands. Poor commanders may be forced to randomly roll for each command. giving more unpredictable results. Finally in HBDBA, you may have more (say 4) or less commands (2 or even one in some cases) depending on the battle.

In short, the BBDBA pip allocation is an abstract mechanism to model the real world in a simple way. While not covering all possibilities, it provides a very good game that generates a decent, believable narrative in just a few hours of play.

To cover the peculiarities of certain battles or armies, you really need to play Historical Battle DBA.

I hope this helps.

Joe Collins

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP01 Sep 2026 10:24 p.m. PST

Aww, it's so cute watching people trying to argue that anything DBA related reflects historical accuracy.
It's fine as a game, but "historical"? Surely you jest.

Decebalus02 Sep 2026 6:47 a.m. PST

John, what activation system is more historical? Sending written commands in a time, where some generals couldnt read? Or no activation system, where everyone does, what you want?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.