"Why do people think that medieval knights are ..." Topic

…decent warriors?

"How come people think that medieval knights such as the Teutonic Knights are decent warriors when medieval knights such as the Teutonic Knights were actually very weak?

The Battle of Grunwald proves that medieval knights were weaklings who had weak stupid military training. The Battle of Grunwald was a battle in which the Teutonic Knights were decisively defeated by a Polish-Lithuanian alliance despite the Polish-Lithuanian alliance being extremely outnumbered by the Teutonic Knights.

Another battle that proves that medieval knights were weaklings was the Battle of the Ice which took place in Russia between the Teutonic Knights and some Russians. The Russians just steamrolled the Teutonic Knights in the Battle of the Ice without any difficulty or losses whatsoever despite being extremely outnumbered by the Teutonic Knights. This proves that the Teutonic Knights are again just amateurs with no proper military training or even martial arts training.

And by the way, the Templar Knights never won battles against Mamluk slave warriors or even killed members of the Mamluk slave warrior class despite the Mamluk warrior class always being extremely outnumbered while the Mamluk slave warrior class always destroyed medieval knights…"

link

Armand

The word 'gibberish' comes immediately to mind. That guy really has some issues.

Monty Python and the Holy Grail is much more historically accurate than that guy…

This is truly where being able to post for free on the internet is really a detriment.
Back in the day of printing, there were actually EDITORS to keep such piffle off the printed page. Paper and ink are expensive!
Harrumph.