Help support TMP


"Women in Combat Arms" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board

Back to the General Historical Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2016-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
18th Century
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

The Usefulness of Plastic Palette Knives

The pros and cons of plastic in palette knifes.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: GF9's 15mm Falaise House

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian explores another variant in the European Buildings range.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


61 hits since 3 Jul 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0103 Jul 2026 1:51 p.m. PST

"The women in combat arms debate is one of those topics where people immediately reach for their knives.

Question anything and you are accused of wanting women out of the military. Support integration and you are accused of ignoring reality. Somewhere in the middle are the veterans who saw things with their own eyes, still have questions, and often stay quiet because the conversation has become too toxic to have honestly.

A retired Marine artillery officer recently shared two stories with me that I have not stopped thinking about.

His point was not that women cannot serve in combat roles. In fact, his observations were far more complicated and, frankly, more nuanced than that.

He described watching the 2014 combat arms integration debate unfold inside his regiment. Interestingly, he said the most forceful objections came not from the junior Marines who would actually live with integration, but from senior leaders and peers. The Lance Corporals and Corporals, after asking intelligent questions, were often the least dramatic about it…"

link

Armand

35thOVI Supporting Member of TMP03 Jul 2026 1:52 p.m. PST

….

"The night before Allen and the boys seized the fort, they all met at Remington's Tavern in Castleton, Vermont. There, they sat down with Benedict Arnold who was sent by the Continental Congress to capture the fort and its guns. The Green Mountain Boys were there because they were going to take the fort anyway, sanctioned or not—so Arnold and his regulars might as well join in.

The liquid courage being poured at the tavern was what was a Revolutionary War cocktail common for the area during that time period: hard cider. Colonists planted apples in the new world primarily for the purpose of drinking them. The crop thrived here and kept people healthy, as it was often safer than the drinking water.

In fact, cider was pretty much used as currency. But back then, drinking men needed more of a kick, so they added shots of rum to their cider, two shots of it to every pint of cider. They called the drink a "Stone Fence" because after more than one, it created a feeling of running down a hill into one."

Subject: Celebrate America's 250th with a real Revolutionary War cocktail


link

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP03 Jul 2026 2:16 p.m. PST

Well, that's a coherent series of posts. 😄

Tango0103 Jul 2026 2:21 p.m. PST

DA BUG is our friend…

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.