
"Raison d'Etre de Cuirassier" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Getting Started with Napoleonics Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article I paint the last two figures from the Escape from the Dark Czar starter set.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
| dogtail | 22 May 2026 5:01 p.m. PST |
In the SYW, the first task of (prussian) cuirassiers was to overthrow the enemy cavalry. Only after that was achieved, the hostile infantry became the focus of the heavy cavalry. When Napoleon kind of reintroduced the armour into the heavy cavalry (beside the 8th regiment), what was the main purpose of that? Has there been a change of doctrin? Is there any contemporary author that discussed that in the years between the SYW and 1802 (beside Frederick the Great)? |
John the OFM  | 22 May 2026 5:44 p.m. PST |
The main reason was to get a +2. It helps. I have 2 Austrian Cuirassier units and 1 REALLY HEAVY CUIRASSIER unit. I'm looking forward. 😄🍺 |
| dogtail | 23 May 2026 1:31 a.m. PST |
Thank you for your feedback. I would give Cuirassiers a better save in hand to hand combat. Have a good day, Sir. |
rustymusket  | 23 May 2026 6:35 a.m. PST |
I always understood Napoleonic cuirassiers were breakthrough troop to be used when a weakness was exposed in the enemy line. The key to Napoleonic warfare in general was to coordinate the use of the 3 types of troops (Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery) to make it difficult to know what type of defense posture to take. If you defend for one troop type, you are hit with another type. John, do you give your Austrian cuirassiers back plates? |
Frederick  | 23 May 2026 9:22 a.m. PST |
While I not sure I suspect the creation of the new French cuirassier regiments – they did have one in the Seven Years War, the Cuirassier de Roi – was in response to the dismal performance of French cavalry during the Seven Years War, when most French cavalry were Chevauxlégers (Light Horse' or ‘Cavalerie Légère, which is a weird carry-over from the Renaissance to differentiate them from gendarmes or fully armoured cavalry – the Chevauxlégers were essentially heavy cavalry and were issued with a cuirass and iron skull cap to wear under their coats/tricornes, although from what I have read they often didn't use them During the Seven Years War there were 32 Gentleman's Chevauxléger regiments – small and most certainly under-performed – whereas the cuirassier regiments in Prussian and Austrian service were quite useful on the battlefield Napoleon as I recall thought of cavalry as a key arm to battlefield success – Without cavalry, battles are without result" – when he reformed the French cavalry at the Camp of Bolougne in 1803 to be a battle-winning force to break a buckling enemy and pursue a victory |
14Bore  | 23 May 2026 10:37 a.m. PST |
From a bunch of podcasts lately, seems Infantry finally learned it couldn't just be trodded down at will. The Napoleonic era probably was the prime of cavalry but Infantry was equal of cavalry until something upset that. |
|