"Why Haldimand and Washington Fought Different Intelligence" Topic

…Wars

"Gen. George Washington has long stood at the center of the American Revolution's intelligence story, but every commander, British and American, in North America understood the importance of intelligence gathering and the impact of information. His use of spies and long-established techniques such as coded messages and invisible ink is well documented, and for many, Washington's efforts and methods have come to define intelligence activities in the Revolutionary period.[1] That emphasis is understandable, but it often results in a limited view of how widespread intelligence-gathering activities were during the war; the effectiveness of British espionage and intelligence gathering is often omitted from studies of Revolutionary-era intelligence. Washington's intelligence efforts were highly successful, yet they were primarily tactical in nature; British Gen. Frederick Haldimand took a broader strategic approach.

Gen. Frederick Haldimand, who commanded British forces in Quebec, employed a different type of intelligence system. Unlike Washington, whose primary goal was to obtain intelligence that enabled him to react to British military operations, Haldimand's intelligence network was a multi-layered system designed to provide strategic information regarding the security of the British province of Quebec.[2] Rather than focusing on the next British military operation, Haldimand's intelligence network provided strategic intelligence that assisted him in defending British Canada, monitoring the loyalty of his subjects, maintaining a fragile frontier, and preventing the Americans from making significant gains in the northern theater…"

Journal of the American Revolution

link

Armand