"The Forever War We Cannot Escape" Topic

In the dusty streets of Mosul in the summer of 2003, an Iraqi lawyer pulled me aside on a street corner. The power was still out weeks after we had toppled Saddam Hussein's regime. "If you don't get the electricity back on soon," he told me, his voice low and urgent, "I will pick up a rifle and fight you." He wasn't an insurgent. He was a professional, a father, a man who had welcomed the end of Baathist tyranny. But he was also a realist. Basic services—electricity, water, order—were the difference between gratitude and armed resistance. That conversation has never left me.

A documentary and an oral history collection later confirmed what that lawyer understood instinctively. Molly Bingham and Steve Connors's 2007 documentary Meeting Resistance captured anonymous fighters in Baghdad describing how occupation frustrations turned ordinary Iraqis into insurgents. Mark Kukis's oral-history collection Voices from Iraq: A People's History, 2003–2009 recorded the same sentiment across nearly seventy interviews—with civilians, politicians like former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, former dissidents, and the very militiamen who eventually took up arms. The message was consistent: populations do not wait patiently while outsiders debate policy. They react to the world they actually live in.

I spent twenty-five years in the U.S. Army, beginning as an enlisted soldier in Cold War Germany, earning a commission, serving multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, and retiring as a Special Forces Lieutenant Colonel. I have seen policy made in Washington and executed—or mis-executed—on the ground. What I have learned is simple, if unfashionable: America will be engaged in conflict for as long as we remain a global power with global interests. "Forever war" is not a choice we can decline. It is the condition of our era. That condition has persisted regardless of official rhetoric. Despite the Obama administration's decision to drop the term "Global War on Terrorism," America has remained engaged in that war since 9/11 and almost certainly will be for decades to come. The evidence is relentless: in February of this year alone, CENTCOM conducted multiple rounds of strikes against more than 30 ISIS targets in Syria. Just days ago, U.S. and Nigerian forces eliminated Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, ISIS's global second-in-command. These are not isolated incidents; they are proof that the fight against jihadist networks is a persistent, global campaign that transcends any single administration's branding…

More here

link

Armand

Yes, that is all true. And I've heard similar from others who were there.

Bottom line … The GWoT continues … In many islamic dominated areas they all are not really ready to move into the 20th let alone the 21st Century.

That's an excellent article !

Very true. A good article.

Trump continues to say the uranium cannot be recovered by Iran on Fox. Bret Beier then asks, why stay? Trump says "public relations" I don't get it.

Regime change, IMO, is the only solution to Iran. But people there are not ready, not happy about the destruction there or the POTUS threats. Maybe this will make the to-do list of the next POTUS via consistent covert ops and support for change.

Glad you like it boys…

Tort: " I don't get it."… who does?… We're looking at how to catch butterflies…

Armand

Armand

I seem to remember another event in 1979

As do I …