
"Representing Snow on the Tabletop" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Terrain and Scenics Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Back to the plastic jungle…
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Creating a hobby music video, using AI and a clip app.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
ochoin  | 07 May 2026 4:02 p.m. PST |
I've been thinking about snowy battlefields on the tabletop, partly prompted by the recent 'Weather' thread & by a fabulous Bulge game AAR, posted by Armand. Snowy battlefields can look absolutely spectacular, but I already have grassy, desert and sea terrain systems and really don't want to add an entire snow setup as well. My existing grassy basing would also look pretty odd on a winter table. So I'm curious how others handle this. Do you: maintain dedicated snow terrain and winter-based armies? abstract snow conditions onto normal terrain? ignore the visual mismatch? use temporary overlays/mats? or simply avoid snowy battles altogether? At what point does visual accuracy matter enough to justify another complete terrain system? |
| CAPTAIN BEEFHEART | 07 May 2026 4:48 p.m. PST |
There was a thing called 'Wondra Flour'. I suppose if I had to go all New England on my terrain, I'd just shake out that or its equivalent on the terrain. Good luck cleaning it all up though. It really depends. Napoleon's retreat from Russia would look weird over sand dunes and palm trees but your average battle fought in a winter wonderland on a whim may be cumbersome. I think that was a run on sentence. |
|