Help support TMP


"We can do historical battles!" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Historical Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Wonder


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

My Little Christmas Trees on the Tabletop

2" mini-trees prepped and shown on the tabletop.


Featured Profile Article

Report from OrcCon 2008

Wyatt the Odd Fezian reports from OrcCon 2008.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


243 hits since 29 Apr 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian29 Apr 2026 6:07 a.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

Can we really "do" historical battles – unit for unit, with critical terrain represented – on a tabletop and, with historical decisions, have a decent shot at historical outcomes?

68% said "yes"
25% said "no"

TMPWargamerabbit29 Apr 2026 11:39 a.m. PST

All the time. My preferred scenario for ancients and horse and musket era games.

Martin Rapier29 Apr 2026 11:49 p.m. PST

Yes, of course. Not much point being a wargamer otherwise, for me anyway.

arthur181530 Apr 2026 8:13 a.m. PST

Refighting historical battles, giving the same historical orders, to see whether a similar outcome resulted, would be one way of testing a set of rules, but it's not something I would want to do regularly. Why play a wargame when you can predict the outcome without doing so?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.